under Janmabhoomi and Food for Work Program and may not be falling under the NABARD scheme. However, the observations made by the Division Bench while considering the similar question may have to be taken into consideration. The next ground which may have to be looked into is the ground of discrimination. It is no doubt stated that in no other cases deductions had been made in the District and certain averments were made on this aspect, in fact, was not specifically denied and that being so, there is discrimination. When similar questions, may be, in relation to the Food for Work Program, had been already considered by the Division Bench and also by the learned single Judge and the decisions are placed before this Court, merely because this falls under NABARD scheme and such ground is taken by the writ petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that this would not seriously alter the situation as far as the maintainability of the Writ Petition is concerned. In view of the same, the Writ Petition being devoid of merit, the same shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
