The High Court of Andhra Pradesh dismissed the writ petition as having become infructuous. The court held that since developments occurred after filing the petition, the petitioner filed another writ petition (W.P.No.25165 of 2005), rendering the current petition unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.21283 of 2002
Dated: 15th September, 2006
Between:
P.S.Rajan
.. Petitioners
and
The District Cooperative Officer, Hyderabad (Urban), Mastab Tank, Hyderabad & others.
.. Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.21283 of 2002
ORDER:
After filing the present writ petition, it seems some developments had taken place, therefore, the petitioner has filed another writ petition bearing W.P.No.25165 of 2005. In view of the same, no cause survives
in this writ petition and it has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.
_____________ C.V.RAMULU, J
Date: 15.9.2006
DA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.21283 of 2002
15.9.2006
P.S.Rajan
The District Cooperative Officer, Hyderabad (Urban), Mastab Tank, Hyderabad
C.V.RAMULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
