The Writ Petition was dismissed as infructuous upon counsel's submission that the matter had become so.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8 of 2000
Dated:14.03.2006
Between: Mr.Rahul Mandewalkar.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, and others.
.....RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.8 of 2000
ORDER:
Learned Counsel Sri Deepak Misra, representing the learned Counsel for the petitioner, Sri Koka Raghava Rao, submits that the matter has become infructuous.
The Writ Petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
14.03.2006
vs
Mr. Rahul Mandewalkar
Government of A.P.
V.V.S.Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
