The High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the cause had become infructuous and did not survive for adjudication.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19280 of 2002
Dated:01.12.2006
Between Chinna Pedda Cheruvu Water Users Association Rep., by its President B.Paparao
…..Petitioner
and
1.The Govt of AP rep., by its Secretary, Irrigation Dept., Secretariat buildings, Hyderabad and others.
…Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU W.P.No.19280 of 2002
ORDER:
Sri Krupavanth, learned counsel, representing Sri K.Chidambaram, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication and it has become infructuous.
Recording the aforesaid submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
_________ 01-12-1006
rkk
Chinna Pedda Cheruvu Water Users Association
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Justice C.V. Ramulu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
