Writ petition dismissed on merits as no representation appeared and no adjudicable issue remained after a long lapse in time.
Writ petition dismissed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.18835 of 1996
ORAL ORDER:
The learned counsel for petitioner states that he had already given up vakalat as early as in the year 1996.
When the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Even otherwise, nothing remains in the writ petition for adjudication at this length of time.
Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.
_____________ C.V.RAMULU, J
Date: 5.12.2006
DA
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.18835 of 1996
5.12.2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.18835 of 1996
Date: 5th December, 2006
Between:
P.Shobarani & others.
.. Petitioner
And
.. Respondents
The Govt. of A.P., rep. by its Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & others.
P. Shobarani & others.
The Govt. of A.P. & others.
C. V. RAMULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
