Common order disposing of writ petitions by referring to a Supreme Court judgment without substantive analysis or specific relief details.
Writ petitions disposed of in terms of the Supreme Court judgment referred to; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
WRIT PETITION Nos.1679, 1680, 1681, 1682, 1683, 1684, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691, 1692, 1693, 1694, 1695, 1696, 1697, 1698, 1699, 1700, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1704, 1705, 1707, 1709 AND 1711 OF 2006
Date: 14-03-2006
Between:
Amara Jayalaxmi … Petitioner
And
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Rep. By its Secretary to Government Revenue Department and others … Respondents
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH
WRIT PETITION Nos.1679, 1680, 1681, 1682, 1683, 1684, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691, 1692, 1693, 1694, 1695, 1696, 1697, 1698, 1699, 1700, 1701, 1702,
1703, 1704, 1705, 1707, 1709 AND 1711 OF 2006
COMMON ORDER (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J):
It is submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that the controversy raised in these writ petitions is covered by a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and another vs. Union of India and others.
In this view of the matter, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the Supreme Court judgment referred to above and the respondents are at liberty to take any steps that may be available to them in terms of the said judgment. No order as to costs.
_____________________ (Bilal Nazki, J) 14th March, 2006 _____________________ (G.Chandraiah, J)
vrn
Amara Jayalaxmi
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Bilal Nazki
G. Chandraiah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
