T.Eswaradu and Sons, represented by T.Rama Krishna, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH

WRIT PETITION Nos.1679, 1680, 1681, 1682, 1683, 1684, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691, 1692, 1693, 1694, 1695, 1696, 1697, 1698, 1699, 1700, 1701, 1702, 1703, 1704, 1705, 1707, 1709 AND 1711 OF 2006

¶5

Date: 14-03-2006

¶6

Between:

¶7

Amara Jayalaxmi … Petitioner

¶8

And

¶9

Government of Andhra Pradesh

¶10

Rep. By its Secretary to Government Revenue Department and others … Respondents

¶11

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI

¶12

AND

¶13

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.CHANDRAIAH

¶14

WRIT PETITION Nos.1679, 1680, 1681, 1682, 1683, 1684, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688, 1689, 1690, 1691, 1692, 1693, 1694, 1695, 1696, 1697, 1698, 1699, 1700, 1701, 1702,

¶15

1703, 1704, 1705, 1707, 1709 AND 1711 OF 2006

¶16

COMMON ORDER (Per the Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, J):

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for both the parties that the controversy raised in these writ petitions is covered by a judgment of the Supreme Court reported in Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited and another vs. Union of India and others.

¶18

In this view of the matter, the writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the Supreme Court judgment referred to above and the respondents are at liberty to take any steps that may be available to them in terms of the said judgment. No order as to costs.

¶19

_____________________ (Bilal Nazki, J) 14^th March, 2006 _____________________ (G.Chandraiah, J)

¶20

vrn

T.Eswaradu and Sons, represented by T.Rama Krishna, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.Eswaradu and Sons, represented by T.Rama Krishna, v. Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Addepalli Suryanaryana, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its

M/s. Vuma Holiday Inns Pvt. Ltd. Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

M/S. Abhishek Enterprises, Vs The Commercial Tax Officer

Vinod Enterprises, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its

Sri Sai Communications, rep.by v.Rama Krishna Reddy Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary to

Suresh Agencies, rep.by O.C.Subrahmanyam Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Secretary to