Petitioner's counsel submitted no further orders were necessary. Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous.
Petitioner's counsel's submission that no further orders are necessary was recorded; petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.13048 OF 2005
10.3.2006
Between:
B.Mahender, S/o.B.Rajaiah AND The Convenor, Ed.CET-2004, Regional Joint Director of School Education, Kakinada And others
… Petitioner
… Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.V.S.RAO
WRIT PETITION No.13048 OF 2005
ORDER:
Learned Counsel for the petitioner, Ms.P.Lakshmi, submits that no further orders are necessary in the writ petition. The submission is recorded.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(V.V.S.RAO, J)
March 10, 2006
YS
B.Mahender
The Convenor, Ed.CET-2004
Regional Joint Director of School Education, Kakinada
V.V.S.RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
