W.P. No. 11573 of 2006 was dismissed as infructuous by the Hon'ble Court upon representation that the cause of action no longer survives for adjudication.
No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
W.P.NO. 11573 OF 2006
DATED: 19.6.2006
Between:
Chintkapalli Venkateswarulu
and
The Assistant Commissioner,
Endowments Department and others
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
W.P.NO.11573 OF 2006
ORAL ORDER:
It is represented by Sri M. Vidya Sagar, learned counsel representing Sri Ravi Shankar Jandhyala, learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
GODA RAGHURAM, J
Date: 19.6.2006
CVM
Chintkapalli Venkateswarulu
The Assistant Commissioner, Endowments Department and others
Ravi Shankar Jandhyala
Goda Raghuram
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
