K.Sita Ramesh and 3 Others. v. SEC.P.R.DEPT.HYDAND3 Others.
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging tax assessment for default due to non-appearance of petitioners and failure to comply with prior orders.
High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging tax assessment for default due to non-appearance of petitioners and failure to comply with prior orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.H.S. ANSARI
and
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.3701 of 1990
Between:
1. K. Sita Ramaiah, S/o Rattaiah, Hindu, Major, Occupation:
Agriculture-cum-Business.
2. Lakshmi Ganapathi Tiles Factory, rep. by its Managing Partner, K. Sita
3. K. Rama Lingam, S/o Sita Ramaiah, Major, Occupation: Agriculture.
4. K. Visweswara Rao, S/o Sita Ramaiah, Major, Occupation:
Agriculturist.
All are residents of Dammapeta, Dammapeta Mandal, Khammam
District.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
1. The Secretary to Government, Panchayat Raj, Govt., of A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
3. The District Panchayat Officer, Khammam District, Khammam.
4. The Executive Officer, Dammapet Gram Panchayat, Dammapet Mandal, Khammam District.
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of Certiorari and call for the records pertaining to the assessment of tax for the years 1986-87 to 198990 from respondent No.4 and the excess levy of tax may be quashed.
Counsel for the Petitioners: MR.P.SUNDARAIAH (Not present) Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP for Panchayat Raj
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
(per the Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Ch. Surya Rao)
Even on this day, there is no representation on the side of the writ petitioners. The writ petitioners have not even cared to comply with the orders of this Court dated 06.04.1990. It is obvious that the petitioners have not been evincing any interest in the writ petition and the writ petition has been filed about one and half decades back.
In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
M.H.S. ANSARI, J.
T.CH. SURYA RAO, J.
Date: 14.03.2005
Nsr
..... REGISTRAR
// TRUE COPY //
SECTION OFFICER
To
1. The Secretary to Government, Panchayat Raj, Govt., of A.P.,
2. The District Collector, Khammam District, Khammam.
3. The District Panchayat Officer, Khammam District, Khammam.
4. The Executive Officer, Dammapet Gram Panchayat, Dammapet
Mandal, Khammam District.
5. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad
(OUT)
6. Two CD copies
Form-NIC-OGS/WP{ }
K. Sita Ramaiah
Lakshmi Ganapathi Tiles Factory
K. Rama Lingam
K. Visweswara Rao
The Secretary to Government, Panchayat Raj, Govt., of A.P.
The District Collector, Khammam District
M.H.S. ANSARI
T.CH. SURYA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court