A writ petition challenging the legality of a municipal notice was dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioner, with liberty to file a fresh petition if required. The court exercised its jurisdiction under Article 226.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.H.S.ANSARI
and
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE T.CH.SURYA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO : 24325 of 2004
Between:
M. Srinivasa Rao, Manager, Kurpam Market, Main Road, Visakhapatnam District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District,
rep. by Commissioner. .....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to Issue writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring the impugned notice issued by the Respondent is illegal and contrary to the provisions of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SMT.N.INDRANI
Counsel for the Respondent: MR.N.RANGA REDDY (SC FOR MUNICIPAL
CORP. VSP.)
The Court at the admission stage made the following :
ORDER:(Per TCSR,J)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition while seeking relief to file fresh petition as against the fresh demand notice issued, if any. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petition as and when occasion arises. No order as to costs.
M.H.S.ANSARI,J
T.CH.SURYA RAO,J
Date: 14-03-2005
Prv
To
1 The Commissioner, Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam District.
2 Two CD copies
3 1 CC to MR.RANGA REDDY (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CROP. VSP.)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. Srinivasa Rao
Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation
M.H.S.ANSARI
T.CH.SURYA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
