The High Court of Andhra Pradesh permitted the appellant to withdraw the writ appeal and dismissed it as withdrawn. No costs were awarded.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ appeal; appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT APPEAL NO : 1566 of 2005
(Writ Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the Order dated 13/07/2005 in WP No.7979 OF 2005 on the file of the High Court.)
Between:
K. John Joseph, S/o. Dr. K.V. John, Kakinada.
..... APPELLANT
AND
1 The District Collector-cum-Spl. Officer,
Kakinada Municipal Corporations,
Kakinada, E.G.District. 2 The Commissioner,
Kakinada, Municipal Corporation, Kakinada. 3 Sri shaik Aijazuddin D.No.20-4-27, Deen house, Mohiddin Street
Kakinada, East Godavari. 4 The Bar Council of A.P.Rep by its Secretary,
High court Building, Hyderabad. R-4 is impleaded as per court order dated 06/09/2005
.....RESPONDENTS
JUDGMENT: (Per Hon’ble Sri Bilal Nazki, The Acting Chief Justice)
After arguing for a while, learned Counsel for the appellant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Appeal. Permission is accorded. Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
(Bilal Nazki, A.C.J)
3rd October, 2005 ---------------------------------(R.Subhash Reddy, J)
LUR
K. John Joseph
The District Collector-cum-Spl. Officer, Kakinada Municipal Corporations, Kakinada
The Commissioner, Kakinada, Municipal Corporation, Kakinada
Sri shaik Aijazuddin
The Bar Council of A.P.
Bilal Nazki
R.Subhash Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
