The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner without prejudice to their rights and contentions.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO : 19736 of 2004
Between:
Sri Jayarama Rice Mill, rep.by its partner Sri Ethakota Bhimasankar Rao, S/o.Satyanaryana,
S.C.No.140, south Section, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1. The Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P.Ltd.,
rep.by its Chairman & Managing Director, Visakhapatnam. 2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation,
EPDCL, Eluru, West Godavari Dist.
3. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, EPDCL,
Eluru, West Godavari Dist.
4. The Asst.Divisional Engineer/Operation/Town, EPDCL,
Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist.
5. The Asst.Acounts officer, Elecricity Revenue officer,
EPDCL, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist.
....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in raising the impugned demand towards the alleged shortfall amount as illegal, unjust and consequently declare the
communication in Letter No. AAO/ERO/TPG/JAO/U/D.No.1468/ 04, on 9-8-2004 & Letter No.AAO/ERO/TPG/JAO/IV/Monthly/D.No. 1878/04, dt.23-9-2004 as null and void.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.VEERASWAMY
Counsel for the Respondents: SMT.M.VINOBHA DEVI (Standing Counsel for AP Genco.
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioner filed letter dated 28th November, 2004 to the effect that the petitioner instructed him to withdraw the Writ Petition, without prejudice to his rights and contentions in the issues invoked.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.
03-12-2004
kvrm
To
1. The Chairman & Managing Director,The Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P.Ltd., Visakhapatnam.
2. The Superintending Engineer, Operation, EPDCL, Eluru, West Godavari Dist. 3. The Divisional Electrical Engineer, EPDCL, Eluru, West Godavari Dist. 4. The Asst.Divisional Engineer/Operation/Town, EPDCL, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist.
5. The Asst.Acounts officer, Elecricity Revenue officer, EPDCL, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari Dist.
6. 2 CD copies
Sri Jayarama Rice Mill
The Eastern Power Distribution Company of A.P.Ltd.
GODA RAGHURAM
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
