The petitioner contends that in the army recruitment, he was selected subject to medical clearance. He was directed to appear before the 4th respondent and the 4th respondent through the proceedings dated 05-06-2004 declared him “unfit” due to “RUDIMENTARY CERVICAL RIBS” during X-ray chest and pathological examination. In the said proceedings, he mentioned that if the petitioner is aggrieved by the said decision, he may prefer an appeal. Accordingly, the petitioner preferred an appeal to the 3rd respondent. The 3rd respondent also, through the proceedings dated 02-07-2004, rejected the case of the petitioner finding him unfit by confirming the order of the 4th respondent. The petitioner being aggrieved by the order of the 3rd respondent, approached this Court seeking to direct the respondents to refer his case to the Government hospital preferably Gandhi or Osmania Government hospital for obtaining medical opinion regarding his suitability for the post of Constable in C.R.P.F. The recruitment to the post of Constable was made by the respondents under the relevant recruitment rules. They provisionally selected the petitioner subject to medical clearance, but, since the medical reports were against the petitioner finding him unfit for the post of the constable, the respondents did not choose to take him into service. When there is a full fledged machinery of medical experts available with the respondent-Organization and when they rejected his case, this Court cannot reopen the matter directing the respondents to send the petitioner to any Government hospital for the purpose of examination regarding his fitness to hold the post of Constable. It is not for the Writ Court to undertake exercise and this court would interfere if there is any illegality in the order passed by the concerned authorities. Since I do not find any illegality in the orders passed by the 3rd and 4th respondents, there shall be no interference in the matter.
