Mandaluru Peddaiah v. Suripalli Mastan Be and Othes
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Andhra Pradesh extended an interim direction of eight weeks in Civil Revision Petition No. 3902 of 2003 and permitted the petitioner to issue personal notice proving service.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND THREE
: PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE : D.S.R. VARMA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 3902 of 2003
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to revise the Order of the court of the Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda in E.A.No. 68/2002 in E.P.No. 64/98 in O.S.No. 253/1995 dated 24-4-2003.
Between: Mandaluru Peddaiah
Petitioner
AND
1. Surepalli Mastan Bi W/o Dastagiri Sab
2. Surepalli Ghousia D/o Dastagiri Sab
3. Surepalli Ashia D/o Dastagiri Sab
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mandaluru Peddaiah
- respondent
Surepalli Mastan Bi W/o Dastagiri Sab
- respondent
Surepalli Ghousia D/o Dastagiri Sab
- respondent
Surepalli Ashia D/o Dastagiri Sab
- respondent
Surepalli Mahaboob Basha S/o Dastagiri Sab
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/3902/2003
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court