The Tribunal directed the petitioner to sign a subscription agreement within thirty days, subject to which the respondent agreed to restore TV signals immediately.
Petitioner directed to enter into a subscription agreement within thirty days for immediate restoration of signals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
6/7/2018
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
DATED 30TH MARCH, 2006
Petition No.81 (C) of 2006
M/s S.V.D. Cable Network …Petitioner Vs. Channel Plus-AP …Respondent
BEFORE:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE, CHAIRPERSON
MR. VINOD VAISH, MEMBER LT.GEN.D.P.SEHGAL(RETD.),MEMBER
For Petitioner : Mr.G.T.Rao, Mr.A. Ramesh, Mr.Viswanath, Advocates For Respondent : Mr.Yogesh Gupta,Advocate
O R D E R
Issue notice. Mr.Yogesh Guptal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent.
-2-
…………………..J (N. Santosh Hegde)
file:///E:/all%20judgement%20year%20wise/judgement%202006/Petition%20No.81(C)%20of%202006.htm
1/2
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
6/7/2018
Chairperson
…………….. (Vinod Vaish) Member
………………. (D.P.Sehgal) Member
file:///E:/all%20judgement%20year%20wise/judgement%202006/Petition%20No.81(C)%20of%202006.htm
2/2
M/s S.V.D. Cable Network
Channel Plus-AP
N. Santosh Hegde
Vinod Vaish
D.P. Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition before the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal in a broadcasting or cable-distribution dispute.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
