The Tribunal granted permission to the petitioner to withdraw the petition as the matter was settled outside the Tribunal and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the petition granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
6/7/2018
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
DATED 20TH APRIL,2006
PETITION No.41(C) OF 2006
Zee Turner Limited … Petitioner Vs.
M/s Hathway Cable and Datacom Private Limited …Respondent
BEFORE:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N. SANTOSH HEGDE, CHAIRPERSON MR. VINOD VAISH, MEMBER LT.GEN.D.P.SEHGAL(RETD.),MEMBER
For : Mr.Maninder Singh with Petitioner Mr.Yoginder Handoo and Mr.Tejveer Singh,Advocates For : Ms.Indu Malhotra, Mr.Dheeraj Nair, Respondent Mr.Vibhav Srivastava,Advocates
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the matter is settled outside the Tribunal, hence seek permission to withdraw the petition. Permission prayed for is granted. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
..….……………..J (N.Santosh Hegde) Chairperson
………………. (Vinod Vaish) Member ………………. (D.P.Sehgal) Member
file:///E:/all%20judgement%20year%20wise/judgement%202006/Petition%20No.41(C)%20of%202006.htm
1/1
Zee Turner Limited
M/s Hathway Cable and Datacom Private Limited
N. SANTOSH HEGDE
VINOD VAISH
D.P.SEHGAL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition before the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal in a broadcasting or cable-distribution dispute.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
