The appeal was dismissed as not pressed because the appellant withdrew the matter after TRAI clarified the points of controversy.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT AND APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI
DATED THE 31st AUGUST, 2001
APPEAL NO. 5 of 2001
Telecom Users Group of India … Appellants Versus Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. & Ors. … Respondents
BEFORE:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUHAS C. SEN,
CHAIRPERSON
MR. R.U.S. PRASAD, MEMBER MR. P.R. DASTUPTA, MEMBER
For Appellant : Atishi Dipankar, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ankur Talwar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Maninder Singh, Advocate (For MTNL) : Mr Anant Kumar, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Advocate
TELECOM DISPUTES SETTLEMENT & APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
ORDER
On 15th May, 2001, we had adjourned the case to enable the Appellant to get clarification from the TRAI on the points of controversy raised in the Appeal. It has now been stated that TRAI, by a communication dated 17th August 2001, has clarified the points at issue. In view of that clarification, the Appellant is not pressing the Appeal. The Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Let a copy of the communication sent by TRAI dated 17th August, 2001 be kept as a part of the record.
Sd/-
…………………………… (SUHAS C. SEN) CHAIRPERSON
Sd/-
…………………………… (R.U.S. PRASAD) MEMBER
Sd/-
…………………………… (P.R.DASGUPTA) MEMBER
Telecom Users Group of India
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd.
Suhas C. Sen
R.U.S. Prasad
P.R. Dastupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
