I96o said complaints. On November 3, 1952, the Sub-Divi- --1 sional Magistrate, after making the necessary enqui- Th• Slat• o Uttar • b "tt d t t h D" . M . P.adesh & Others rres, su mr . e a repor o t e rstrwt agrstrate v. · recommendmg the transfer of the respondent to some Ajodhya P.asad other station. On November 17, 1952, the District Magistrate sent an endorsement to the Superintendent Subba Rao J · of Police to the effect that the Sub-Divisional Magistrate had found substantial complaints against the· integrity of the respondent, that he had also received such complaints and that his general reputation for integrity was not good, but that his transfer should, however, come after sometime and that in the meantime his work might be closely watched. On being called upon by the Superintendent of Police to submit an explanation for his conduct, the respondent submitted his explanation on November 29, 1952. On December 17, 1952, the respondent was forced to go on leave for two months. Before the expiry of his leave, he was reverted to his substantive post of head constable and transferred to Sitapur. On February 17, 1953, he was promoted to the rank of officiating Sub-Inspector and posted as Station Officer at Sidholi. On ]'ebruary 27, 1953, the Superintendent of Police made the following endorsement in his character roll:
