1 960 desired to dismiss them. Further it may be that they . could be recalled by the Scindias aud it may even be Gulaba;m:' 11 01 kia that they might have the option to go back to the &- Others Scindias. But these are only three special terms' of v. their employment with the ASL Subject to these The s,fodfa Steam special terms, they would for all purposes be the em- Nav•gation ployees of the ASI and thus would in law be in the Comp;."b;,,!:rnbay employment of the ASI ?oth on July 1, 1952. and on August 1, 1953. The existence of these spe01al terms Wan,hoo J. in the case of these appellants would not in law make them any the less employees of the ASI, for whom they were working and who were paying them, who had power of control and direction over them; who would grant them leave, fix their hours of work and so on. There can in our opinion be no doubt that subject to these special terms the appellants were in the employ of the ASI in law. They would therefore be in the employ of the ASI prior to July 1, 1952 and would still be in its employ immediately before August 1, 1953. Consequently, they would clearly be governed by s. 20(1). As they did not exercise the option given to them by the proviso to s. 20(1), they became the employees of the Corporation from August 1, 1953, by the terms of the statute.
