Applicant in a pending criminal appeal sought interim suspension of sentence but counsel withdrew the application at the hearing. The Division Bench dismissed the suspension-of-sentence application as withdrawn; no other relief was sought or granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:6947-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Criminal Misc. 3rd (Interim) Suspension Of Sentence Application No. 170/2026
IN
D.B. Criminal Appeal No. 261/2020
Manish Kumar S/o Shri Pyarelal, R/o Ward No. 33 Near Veer Balaji Temple, Nawalgarh, Police Station Nawalgarh District Jhunjhunu (Raj.) (At Present Serving Sentence In District Jail Jhunjhunu)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Govind Prasad Rawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP with Mr. Vinod Sharma
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order
13/02/2026
Learned counsel for the applicant wants to withdraw this Criminal Misc. 3rd (Interim) Suspension Of Sentence Application.
The Criminal Misc. 3rd (Interim) Suspension Of Sentence Application is dismissed accordingly.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J
Tahir.17
Manish Kumar S/o Shri Pyarelal
State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P.
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
Sameer Jain
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
