Disposed

Sunil Son of Brijmohan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Feb 2026SOSA/115/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Two applicants convicted under Sections 8/20 NDPS Act to ten years' rigorous imprisonment sought a second suspension of sentence during appeal. The court granted suspension subject to furnishing a personal bond of one lakh rupees and two sureties of fifty thousand rupees each, suspending execution until the appeal concludes.

What did the court decide?

Second suspension of sentence granted subject to personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 and two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each; sentence execution stayed till final disposal of appeal.

Sunil Son of Brijmohan Singh Vs State of Rajasthan — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:6096]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Misc 2nd Suspension of Sentence Application No. 115/2026

¶4

¶5

S.B. Criminal Appeal No.2260/2025

¶6

Sunil Son Of Brijmohan Singh, Residentof Amokhari, Post Dathroi, District Hathras, Police Station Hathras Junction, Uttar Pradesh

¶7

(At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu)

¶8

Dheeraj @ Mota Son Of Jaswant, Resident Of Untoli, Police Station Bahror, District Alwar (Raj.)

¶9

(At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu)

¶10

----Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶13

----Respondent

¶14

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, PP

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order

¶16

10/02/2026

¶17

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 430 ch-,u-,l-,l- ds varxZr izLrqr ;g f}rh; ltk LFkxu@tekur vkosnu ij nksuksa i{kksa dks lquk x;kA v/khuLFk fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds vkyksP; fu.kZ; ,oa i=koyh ij miyC/k dkuwuh o rF;kRed fLFkfr ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶18

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk izFke ltk LFkxu vkosnu okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k FkkA

¶19

fopkj.k U;k;ky; fof'k"V U;k;k/kh'k] Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa eu%izHkkoh

¶20

inkFkZ vf/kfu;e izdj.k ¼vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k la[;k 02½ [ksrM+h] ftyk&>qa>quwa }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 12@2021 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 05-08-2025 ds ek/;e ls vfHk;qDrx.k dks /kkjk 8@20 Lokid vkS"kf/k ,oa

[2026:RJ-JP:6096]

[SOSA-115/2026]

(2 of 3)

eu%izHkkoh inkFkZ vf/kfu;e] 1985 ds rgr nks"kfl) ?kksf"kr dj vf/kdre 10 o"kZ ds dBksj dkjkokl o vFkZn.M ls nafMr fd;k gSA

¶25

fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k dk fuosnu gS fd vihykFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k funksZ"k gSa rFkk mUgsa izdj.k esa feF;k :i ls fyIr fd;k x;k gS] os yEcs le; ls vfHkj{kk esa gksdj djhc vk/kh ltk Hkqxr pqds gSaA fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;y; dk fu.kZ; Saudan Singh Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh Criminal Appeal No. 308/2022 is'k fd;kA nks"kfl)h gsrq i;kZIr lkexzh i=koyh ij ugha jgh gSA vihy esa lQy gksus dh iw.kZ laHkkouk gS] fdUrq vihy ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vUr esa ltk LFkfxr fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶26

fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us ltk LFkxu vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶27

lquk x;k ,oa leLr rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;k x;kA

¶28

izdj.k ds rF;ksa o ifjfLFkfr;ksa] fo}ku vf/koDrk

¶29

izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k }kjk ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= ds leFkZu esa U;k;ky; ds le{k izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] izLrqr vihy esa mBk;s x;s dkuwuh eqn~nksa vkfn dks /;ku esa j[krs gq,] xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk] ;g ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA

¶30

ifj.kker% ;g f}rh; ltk LFkxu izkFkZuk i= izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k 1- lqfuy iq= c`teksgu flg o 2- /khjt mQZ eksVk iq= tloar dh vksj ls fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vf/kjksfir lEiw.kZ vFkZn.M dh jkf'k fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa tek djk;s tkus dh iwoZorhZ 'krZ ij Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn bl U;k;ky; esa fnukad 12-03-2026 dks ,oa rRi'pkr tc Hkh mUgsa vknsf'kr fd;k tkos] viuh mifLFkfr gsrq izR;sd }kjk ,d yk[k :i;s dk ca/ki= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks tekursa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn izLrqr dj rLnhd djok

¶31

[2026:RJ-JP:6096] (3 of 3) [SOSA-115/2026]

¶32

nsa rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkos ,oa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds }kjk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDrx.k ds laca/k esa ikfjr vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukafdr 05-08-2025 ds rgr dkjkokl ds laca/k esa fn;s x;s n.Mkns'k dk fdz;kUo;u bl vihy ds vfUre fu.kZ; gksus rd LFkfxr j[kk tkosA

¶33

(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J

¶34

DINESH KUMAWAT /01

Sunil Son of Brijmohan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Son of Brijmohan Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh S/O Shri Bajranglal Vs State of Rajasthan

Nagar Parishad Alwar Thr Commissioner Vs Smt Somoti Devi and Ors.

Faizal @ Baccha S/O Ahsan Ali Vs State of Rajasthan

Giriraj Prasad Sharma S/O Shri Ramotar @ Ramswaroop Sharma Vs Shubham Sharma S/O Shri Mangal Chand Sharma W/O Pankaj Sharma

Bhaurilal and Another Vs Gullaram through Lrs and Others

Shivam S/O Shree Girraj Vs State of Rajasthan