The Rajasthan High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner facing a prosecution under Section 406 IPC for misappropriation, noting the absence of further incriminating evidence and reasonable ground for belief in his innocence.
Petitioner released on bail with bond conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:6106]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1986/2026
Shivam S/o Shree Girraj, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gudha Katla, Police Station Baswa, District Dausa, Presently Resident Of 195/132, Sector-19, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.). (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail, Ajmer).
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
10/02/2026
izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= ch-,u-,l-,l- dh /kkjk 483 ds vUrxZr iqfyl Fkkuk&ekyiqjk] Vksad esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&158@2025 vijk/k vUrxZr /kkjk 331¼4½] 305¼e½ ch-,u-,l- esa is'k fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vf/koDrk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk fuosnu gS fd izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk izFke tekur vkosnu fnukad 16-12-2025 dks okfil fy;s tkus ds vk/kkj ij [kkfjt fd;k x;k Fkk] cdk;k vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) nks ekg ls vuqla/kku iw.kZ ugha gqvk gS] vfHk;qDr fnukad 17-09-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] mlls egRoiw.kZ vuqla/kku gksdj vkjksi i= is'k gks pqdk gS] lg&vfHk;qDr lksuw ftlds fo:) dkQh vkijkf/kd izdj.k lafLFkr Fks] dh tekur led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS] ftlls izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ekeyk gYdk gS] 'ks"k fopkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
[CRLMB-1986/2026]
[2026:RJ-JP:6106]
(2 of 2)
blds foijhr fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dk ;g tekur vkosnu [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
vkns'k dh ikyuk esa Jh pSukjke] Fkkukf/kdkjh] iqfyl Fkkuk&ekyiqjk] ftyk&Vksad mifLFkr vk,] ftudk fuosnu gS fd lg&vfHk;qDr dh fxj¶rkjh ugha gks ikbZ gS] ln~Hkkfod iz;kl tkjh gSa] vuqla/kku esa le; yxsxkA
nksuksa i{kksa dh cgl ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;kA
orZeku ekeys esa vfHk;qDr ds fo:) ;g vkjksi gS fd mlus vU; vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk feydj ,-Vh-,e- ftlesa 12]77]000@&:i;s Fks] m[kkM+dj ys x;sA vfHk;qDr ds fo:) iwoZ esa ,d vkijkf/kd izdj.k ntZ gS] mlds vykok dksbZ vU; izdj.k lafLFkr ugha gS] lg&vfHk;qDr lksuw] ftlds fo:) gR;k] ,u-Mh-ih-,l- vkfn ds xaHkhj vkijkf/kd izdj.k igys ls yafcr Fks] dh tekur led{k ihB }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gSA
vr% izdj.k ds rF;ksa] ifjfLFkfr;ksa] izLrqr rdksaZ ,oa izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dh vfHkj{kk vof/k vkfn dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, izdj.k ds xq.k&nks"kksa ij fVIi.kh fd;s fcuk izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
ifj.kker% izkFkhZ&vfHk;qDr f'koe iq= fxjkZt dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g f}rh; tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj dj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izkFkhZ bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; ;k varfjrh U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= rFkk ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks lqn`< izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr dj izekf.kr djkos rks gLrxr izdj.k esa mls tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,A
(UMA SHANKER VYAS),J
DINESH KUMAWAT /04
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail given the nature of the pending prosecution and lack of further evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivam S/o Shree Girraj
State Of Rajasthan
Uma Shanker Vyas
Dinesh Kumawat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
