Dismissed¶51

Kali Charan Das, S/O Shri Sharad Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC27 May 2026CW/9824/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Home Guards Rajasthan; upper age limit 58 years; Rule 9 Rajasthan Home Guards (Amendment) Rules 2021; Notification dated 28.05.2021; prayer for extension of service until 60 years; writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; order dated 17.10.2025 in SBCWP No. 20545/2025 (Jodhpur); Rafiq Mohammad Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors., S.B.CWP No.15251/2024 (order dated 18.09.2024); Justice Sudesh Bansal; Jaipur Bench; decided 27/05/2026.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the writ petitions; the writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; stay applications and all other pending applications disposed of. ¶51

Kali Charan Das, S/O Shri Sharad Chand Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Leave to withdraw the writ petitions; the writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn; stay applications and all other pending applications disposed of.

¶51

Issue for consideration

Whether serving Home Guard members whose retirement falls due on attaining 58 years under Rule 9 of the Rajasthan Home Guards (Amendment) Rules, 2021 could seek a direction to the respondents to extend their services until they attain 60 years.

¶44

Court's answer

As per the Notification dated 28.05.2021 promulgating the Rajasthan Home Guards (Amendment) Rules, 2021, the upper age limit of Home Guards stands prescribed at 58 years, Rule 9 providing that a member of the Home Guards may continue to be such member only until he attains the age of 58 years.

¶48

Ratio / Principle

Counsel for the petitioners, in view of the position under Rule 9 of the 2021 Amendment Rules, did not press the writ petitions and sought permission to withdraw them; accordingly the writ petitions stand dismissed as withdrawn.

¶51

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Four connected writ petitions (S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 9823, 9825, 9833 and 9824 of 2026) by serving Home Guards based in Jaipur - Hariom Mudgal, Sultan Singh Meena, Divan Chand and Kali Charan Das, aged about 57-58 years - sought extension of service until 60 years although retirement fell due at 58. The court recorded that, by Notification dated 28.05.2021, the Rajasthan Home Guards (Amendment) Rules, 2021 prescribe the upper age limit of Home Guards at 58 years, Rule 9 permitting a member to continue as such member only until he attains that age. Counsel had placed reliance on an order dated 17.10.2025 in SBCWP No. 20545/2025 (Jodhpur) and on the earlier order dated 18.09.2024 in Rafiq Mohammad Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors., S.B.CWP No.15251/2024. In view of Rule 9, counsel did not press the petitions and sought withdrawal; the court dismissed the writ petitions as withdrawn and disposed of the stay applications and other pending applications. (Sudesh Bansal, J.; order dated 27/05/2026.)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:22592]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9823/2026

¶4

Hariom Mudgal S/o Shri Chiranji Lal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 14816, Beriya Kachchi Basti, Naahari Ka Naka, Shastri Nagar, Jaipur (302016), Rajasthan

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (302005), Rajasthan

¶8

The Director General And Commandant General Of Home Guards, Department Of Home Guards, Government Of Rajasthan, Plot No. 4/1/10-11, Sector-4, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (302029), Rajasthan

¶9

The District Commandant (Home Guards), Home Guards Training Centre, Jaipur, Rajasthan

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connect with

¶12

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9825/2026

¶13

Sultan Singh Meena S/o Shri Gheesa Ram Meena, Aged About 57 Years, R/o E-115, Baiji Ki Kothi, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur (302004), Rajasthan

¶14

----Petitioner

¶15

Versus

¶16

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (302005), Rajasthan

¶17

The Director General And Commandant General Of Home Guards, Department Of Home Guards, Government Of Rajasthan, Plot No. 4/1/10-11, Sector-4, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (302029), Rajasthan

¶18

The District Commandant (Home Guards), Home Guards Training Centre, Jaipur, Rajasthan

¶19

----Respondents

¶20

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9833/2026

¶21

Divan Chand S/o Shri Khairati Lal, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 12846, Jatiji Ki Bagichi, Laxminarayanpuri, Mandi Khatikan, Jaipur (302003), Rajasthan.

¶22

----Petitioner

¶23

Versus

¶24

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (302005) Rajasthan.

¶25

The Director General And Commandant General Of

(2 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:22592]

[CW-9823/2026]

Home Guards, Department Of Home Guards, Government Of Rajasthan Plot No. 4/1/10-11, Sector-4, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (302039) Rajasthan.

¶30

The District Commandant (Home Guards), Home Guards Training Centre, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶31

----Respondents

¶32

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9824/2026

¶33

Kali Charan Das, S/o Shri Sharad Chand, Aged About 58 Years, R/o 61, Regar Basti, Tonk Phatak Ke Pass, Mansingh Pura, Jaipur (302018), Rajasthan

¶34

----Petitioner

¶35

Versus

¶36

1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (302005), Rajasthan.

¶37

1. The Director General And Commandant General Of Home Guards, Department Of Home Guards, Government Of Rajasthan, Plot No. 4/1/10-11, Sector4, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur (302039), Rajasthan

¶38

1. The District Commandant (Home Guards), Home Guards Traning Centre, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶39

----Respondents

¶40

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Punit Singhvi,
	Mr. Ishan Verma
For Respondent(s)	:

¶41

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶42

Order

¶43

27/05/2026

¶44

In this batch of writ petition, writ petitioners have raised a grievance of similar nature that as Home Guard, their retirement is due on attaining the age of 58 years, yet, they are willing to serve as Home Guard until attaining the age of 60 years, hence, respondents be directed to consider their grievance for extension of their services until attaining the age of 60 years. In view of above grievance, counsel for the petitioners have placed reliance

¶45

(3 of 3) [CW-9823/2026]

¶46

[2026:RJ-JP:22592]

¶47

on the order dated 17.10.2025, passed in SBCWP No. 20545/2025 by Coordinate Bench at Principle Seat, Jodhpur, wherein the writ petition was disposed of in terms of previous order dated 18.09.2024, passed in case of Rafiq Mohammad Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors. in S.B.CWP No.15251/2024 .

¶48

Indisputably, as per Notification dated 28.05.2021, by promulgation of the Rajasthan Home Guards (Amendment) Rules, 2021, the upper age limit of Home Guards has been prescribed up to the age of 58 years. Rule 9 of the Amended Rules of 2021 reads as under:

¶49

“9. Age limit for a member of the Home Guards- A member of the Home Guards may continue to be such member until he attains the age of 58 years.”

¶50

In view of above, counsel for the petitioners does not want to press these writ petitions and seeks permission to withdraw these writ petitions.

¶51

Accordingly, these writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶52

Stay applications and all other pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶53

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶54

Pcg/130 to 132 and 135

Kali Charan Das, S/O Shri Sharad Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kali Charan Das, S/O Shri Sharad Chand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajendra Prasad Sharma Son of Shri Yadi Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Abdul Razzaq Son of Shri Subhan Khan Vs Development Officer

Dr. Rajesh Sharma Son of Shri Kedar Nath Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Hariom Mudgal S/O Shri Chiranji Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Divan Chand S/O Shri Khairati Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Sultan Singh Meena S/O Shri Gheesa Ram Meena, Vs State of Rajasthan