Hariom Mudgal S/O Shri Chiranji Lal, v. State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Home Guard retirement age extension Rajasthan; service till 60 years sought while Rule 9 of Rajasthan Home Guards (Amendment) Rules, 2021 caps membership at 58 years; Notification dated 28.05.2021; petitioners Hariom Mudgal, Sultan Singh Meena, Divan Chand, Kali Charan Das versus State of Rajasthan, Director General and Commandant General of Home Guards, District Commandant (Home Guards) Jaipur; counsel Punit Singhvi and Ishan Verma; reference to Rafiq Mohammad Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors., S.B.CWP No.15251/2024 (order dated 18.09.2024) and SBCWP No. 20545/2025 (order dated 17.10.2025, Jodhpur Bench); result: writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn on 27/05/2026 by Justice Sudesh Bansal; no adjudication on merits; useful chiefly to trace the reliance chain on Home Guard age-extension orders.
What did the court decide?
None on merits; writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn at counsel's request, and stay applications along with all other pending applications stand disposed of.