Petitioner's vehicle registration certificate was suspended; following a Co-ordinate Bench decision in Tofik Ahmed, the court set aside the impugned order, directed revocation subject to reporting to the notice issuing authority and adjudication thereafter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:9440]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4085/2026
M/s Singhal Bio Resources, Prop. Vijay Kumar Singhal, H.No. 204, Sector 16, Faridabad, Through Proprietor Vijay Kumar Singhal S/o Raghu Nandan Singhal, Aged About 59 Years, R/o House No. 204, Ward No. 19, Sector 16, Daulatabad, Sector 16, Post Sector 16, District Faridabad, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle No. Hr 38 Ab 9954.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Hemant Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG assisted by Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order
05/03/2026
Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of
Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025.
[2026:RJ-JP:9440]
[CW-4085/2026]
(2 of 3)
“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.
(3 of 3)
[2026:RJ-JP:9440]
[CW-4085/2026]
(i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioner was suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioner and its family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioner along with its counsel concerned shall report to/before the Notice Issuing Authority on 21.03.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and shall submit their explanation.
(ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J
ARTI SHARMA /42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suspension of the vehicle's Registration Certificate should be set aside in light of directions in Tofik Ahmed.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.Followed
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025
M/s Singhal Bio Resources (Prop. Vijay Kumar Singhal)
State of Rajasthan, Transport Department
Department of Mining and Geology, Government of Rajasthan
Commissioner, Transport Department, Government of Rajasthan
District Transport Officer, Kotputli
Ganesh Ram Meena
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
