Dismissed

M/S Subham Construction Company v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC5 Mar 2026CW/3945/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition concerning the suspension of vehicle Registration Certificates. Relying on a coordinate bench order, the Court set aside the suspension, treating the vehicles as the petitioners' livelihood, and directed them to appear before authorities on a specified date to submit explanations.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order suspending the Registration Certificate was set aside subject to the condition that the petitioner appears on 21.03.2026 to submit an explanation, with adjudication to follow within

M/S Subham Construction Company Vs State of Rajasthan — Motor Accident Claims | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:9439]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3945/2026

¶4

M/s Subham Construction Company, Registered Address W No 25 Chirawa District Jhunjhunun Rajasthan Through Proprietor Dinesh Kumar Jat Aged About 43 Years, R/o Village Deengli, Churu, Rajasthan Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 18 Gc 6631.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rasjasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary

¶8

Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.

¶9

Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶10

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Sikar District Sikar.

¶11

District Transport Officer, Dto Office Jhunjhunun District Jhunjhunun

¶12

----Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Mayank Singhal Mr. Prashant Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG assisted by
	Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore

¶14

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶15

Order

¶16

05/03/2026

¶17

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition, has already been decided by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ

¶18

Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & Ors. Vs. State of

¶19

Rajasthan & Ors.) decided on 20.11.2025.

(2 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:9439]

[CW-3945/2026]

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State agrees and submits that the present writ petition may also be decided in the light of the directions passed in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra).

¶24

Operative parts of the order dated 20.11.2025, passed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), are as follows :-

¶25

“6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall report to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days.

¶26

Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶27

It is made clear that during the period of consideration of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as registered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado.

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:9439]

[CW-3945/2026]

It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order.

¶32

In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.”

¶33

Accordingly, in view of the directions given in case of Tofik Ahmed & Ors. (supra), the present writ petition also stands disposed off as under:-

¶34

(i) The impugned order whereby, the Registration Certificate of the vehicles owned/possessed by the petitioner was suspended, is set aside for the reason that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioner and its family. The aforesaid revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioner along with its counsel concerned shall report to/before the Notice Issuing Authority on 21.03.2026 preferably in between 11:00 AM to 01:00 PM and shall submit their explanation.

¶35

(ii) Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority and adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days.

¶36

Stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶37

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶38

ARTI SHARMA /41

M/S Subham Construction Company v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S Subham Construction Company v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Singh @ Vijaydev S/O Bacchu Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Rishab Ranjan Rishab Ranjan S/O Shri Dileep Kumar Chaudhary Vs State of Rajasthan

Priya W/O Hariram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Manbhar Devi W/O Shri Rameshwar Prasad Sharma Vs Jaipur Development Authority

Smt. Shabbo W/O Abdul Rahim Vs M/S Sajni Mehndi Product

M/S Singhal Bio Resources Vs State of Rajasthan