Sarvan Kumar Raigar S/O Shri Kanaram Raigar v. the State of Rajasthan
Case brief
What is this about?
Rajasthan HC Jaipur | S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20733/2025 (connected with 20758/2025 and 20772/2025) | Justice Sameer Jain | Judgment dated 15/01/2026 | Petitions disposed of in light of the ratio in Bimala Kumari Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., DB Special Appeal Writ No.152/2023; controversy noted as no more res integra and squarely covered; respondents unable to controvert | Respondents: The State of Rajasthan (Principal Secretary, Education Department), Rajasthan Employee Selection Board Jaipur, Director Secondary Education Rajasthan Bikaner, National Council For Teacher Education (NCTE) | Counsel: Mr. RD Meena for petitioner(s); Mr. Devansh Sharma and Mr. Kinshuk Jain for respondent(s) | Pending applications, if any, stand disposed.
What did the court decide?
Since the controversy is squarely covered by the dictum in Bimala Kumari (supra) and learned counsel for the respondents is not able to controvert the same, the present petitions are disposed of in light of the ratio encapsulated in Bimala Kumari (supra).