Disposed¶22

A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd. v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd.

Rajasthan HC7 Mar 2026CW/20503/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd. v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. & Standing Settlement Committee; S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20503/2025; Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; Justice Ganesh Ram Meena; order dated 07/03/2026; RRVPNL; Standing Settlement Committee; dispute referred 14.11.2025; direction to decide claim; time-bound disposal within two months; writ petition disposed of; stay application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent No.2, the Standing Settlement Committee, RRVPNL, to decide the petitioner's claim in view of the dispute referred to it as early as possible, preferably within two months from the date of submitting the certified copy of the order; the stay application and pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ¶22

A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd. Vs Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd. — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶22

Issue for consideration

Whether respondent No.1 (RRVPNL) should be directed to refer the petitioner's dispute and claim to respondent No.2, the Standing Settlement Committee, RRVPNL. +1 more

¶15

Ratio / Principle

The Court held that ends of justice would be met if respondent No.2, the Standing Settlement Committee, RRVPNL, is directed to decide the petitioner's claim as early as possible, the reference having been pending for more than two and a half months.

¶21

Key takeaways

The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2, the Standing Settlement Committee, to decide the petitioner's claim, in view of the dispute referred to it, as early as possible, preferably within two months from the date of submitting the certified copy of the order.ratio¶22

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ petition (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20503/2025, Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench, decided 07/03/2026 by Ganesh Ram Meena, J.) filed by A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd. seeking a direction to RRVPNL (respondent No.1) to refer its dispute and claim to the Standing Settlement Committee (respondent No.2) and a direction to the Committee to decide the claim expeditiously. The Court recorded that respondent No.1 had already referred the matter to the Standing Settlement Committee on 14.11.2025, but the claim remained undecided for more than two and a half months. Holding that the ends of justice would be met, the Court disposed of the writ petition directing the Standing Settlement Committee to decide the petitioner's claim, in view of the dispute referred to it, as early as possible, preferably within two months from submission of the certified copy of the order. The stay application and pending applications, if any, also stood disposed of.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:9861]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20503/2025

¶4

A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd., (Previously Known As A2Z Maintenance And Engineering Services Ltd.), Having Its Registered Office At O- 116, First Floor, Shopping Mall, Arjun Marg, Dlf City, Phase - I, Gurgaon -122003 Through Its Authorised Signatory, Shri Vikas Agarwal

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar Jaipur, Through Its Superintending Engineer (Design).

¶8

The Standing Settlement Committee, Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan Jyoti Nagar Jaipur, Through The Managing Director, Rrvpnl

¶9

----Respondents

¶10

For Petitioner(s)

¶11

: Mr. Vikas Agarwal, Authorized Signatory present-in-person

¶12

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

¶13

Order

¶14

07/03/2026

¶15

The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to issue appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent No.1 to refer the dispute and the claim of the petitioner to the respondent No.2 i.e. Standing Settlement Committee, RRVPNL and to issue directions to the respondent No.2-Standing Settlement Committee to decide the claim of the petitioner expeditiously within a time bound programme.

¶16

Mr. Vikas Agarwal, Authorized Signatory of the petitioner submits that though the respondent No.1 on consideration of the representation of the petitioner has referred the matter to the

[2026:RJ-JP:9861]

[CW-20503/2025]

(2 of 2)

Standing Settlement Committee on 14.11.2025 but the Standing Settlement Committee has not decided the claim of the petitioner so far even after passing of more than two and half months.

¶21

Taking into consideration the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner and the facts on record and more particularly the fact that the matter has been referred to the Standing Settlement Committee on 14.11.2025 which is pending for adjudication for last more than two and half months, the Court feels that ends of justice would meet if the respondent No.2 i.e Standing Settlement Committee, RRVPNL is directed to decide the claim of the petitioner as early as possible.

¶22

Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 i.e. Standing Settlement Committee to decide the claim of the petitioner in view of the dispute referred to it as early as possible preferably within a period of two months from the date of submitting the certified copy of this order.

¶23

In view of the order passed in the main petition, the stay application as well as pending application, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶24

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶25

Ashish Kumar /6

A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd. v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A2Z Infra Engineering Ltd. v. Rajasthan Rajya Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Khandelwal S/O Shri Govind Sharan Khandelwal Vs Shyam Singh Shekhawat S/O Shri Ummed Singh

Smt. Manbhar Devi W/O Shri Rameshwar Prasad Sharma Vs Jaipur Development Authority

M/S Subham Construction Company Vs State of Rajasthan

Ranjeet Singh Meena S/O Shri Netaram Vs State of Rajasthan

Harsh Trading Company Vs the State of Rajasthan

Vinod Kumar S/O Vijay Singh Vs Maharshi Dayanand Saraswati University