Disposed

Sahad S/O Shri Deenu v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC7 Jul 2026CW/11445/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Truck owners challenged e-notice-based suspension of their vehicles' registration certificates for overloading or alteration without notice. The writ petition was disposed in light of earlier decisions, directing petitioners to appear before the concerned authorities within a week with vehicles and fees for hearing within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed: petitioners to appear before competent authority within one week with vehicles; hearing and order within two weeks; no other relief granted.

Sahad S/O Shri Deenu Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:25230]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11445/2026

¶4

URN: CW / 25370U / 2026

¶5

Sahad S/o Shri Deenu, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Lewra, Tehsil Kaman, Bharatpur, Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Rj-05Gb-5701.

¶6

Pradeep Kashyap S/o Shri Daal Chand Kashyap, R/o 1920, Vimla Colony, Mungaska, Alwar. Owner Of Truck Beaing No. Rj-05Gb-6435.

¶7

Anas Trading Company, Through Its Proprietor Shri Sabbir S/o Shri Idrish, Registered Office At Shop No.2, Dabra T Point, Pahari, Bharatpur, Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Rj-05Gc-0418.

¶8

Ruman S/o Shri Sahdik, R/o Dabra, Tehsil Pahari, Bharatpur, Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Rj-05Gb9030.

¶9

Saddam S/o Shri Tundal, R/o Village Olanda, Tehsil Kaman, Bharatpur, Owner Of Truck Bearing Number Rj05Gb-6076.

¶10

----Petitioners

¶11

Versus

¶12

State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.

¶13

The Joint Secretary, Mines And Geology Department, Secretrait, Jaipur, Rajasthan,

¶14

Regional Transport Officer, Bharatpur.

¶15

Regional Transport Officer, Alwar.

¶16

District Transport Officer, Kotputali, District Kotputali Behror.

¶17

Regional Transport Officer, Sikar.

¶18

Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur First.

¶19

Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur-Ii.

¶20

District Transport Officer, Jhunjhunu.

¶21

District Transport Officer, Bhiwadi, District Alwar.

¶22

----Respondents

¶23

[CW-11445/2026]

¶24

[2026:RJ-JP:25230]	(2 of 3)
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal Ms. Morvi Sharma
	Mr. Jaswant Sharma
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. S S Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG

¶25

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶26

Order

¶27

07/07/2026

¶28

;kphx.k dh vksj ls ;g fjV ;kfpdk [kku ,oa HkwfoKku foHkkx }kjk tkjh bZ&joUuk ls ;kph ds okguksa ds vf/kd Hkkj (Overloading)@cnyko (alteration) ds vk/kkj ij] fcuk uksfVl fn, muds okgu dk iath;u izek.k&i= (Registration Certificate) fuyfEcr (suspend) fd, tkus ds vkns'k ls O;fFkr gksdj bl vuqrks"k ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gS %&

¶29

"It is, therefore, humble prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and may be further be pleased to call for the entire record of the case and by way of appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, thereby, issue the necessary direction(s) to the respondents :-

¶30

(i) respondents be directed to revoke the suspension of registration certificate of the vehicles of the petitioners;

¶31

(ii) cost of writ petition may also be awarded in favour of petitioner,

¶32

(iii) and may pass any other oder (s) which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the Case."

¶33

v;kph@foHkkx dh vksj ls vkt fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk Jh

¶34

,l-,l-u:dk vfxze uksfVl ij mifLFkr gSa] mUgsa ;kfpdk dh izfr miyC/k djkbZ xbZA

¶35

nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us izdV fd;k fd bl ekeys eas tks

¶36

iz'u vUroZfyr (involve) gS] ogh leku iz'u bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk U;kf;d fu.kZ; Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. No. 9721 rFkk Mustak and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P.

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:25230]

[CW-11445/2026]

20073/2025 esa fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% mDr fu.kZ;ksa ds izdk'k esa gh bl izdj.k dks Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶41

fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh lhfer izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g fjV ;kfpdk bl funsZ'k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd ;kphx.k vius&vius okguksa rFkk tokc lfgr lEcfU/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ¼ftuds }kjk muds okguksa dk iath;u izek.k&i= fuyfEcr fd;k x;k gS½] ds le{k bl vkns'k dh frfFk ls ,d LkIrkg ds Hkhrj vko';d :i ls mifLFkr gksaxsA rri'pkr l{ke vf/kdkjh }kjk nks lIrkg dh vof/k esa lquokbZ dj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk;sxkA

¶42

lacaf/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ds le{k lR;kiu@fujh{k.k gsrq okgu ys tkus ds vfrfjDr ;kphx.k mDr vof/k ds nkSjku vius&vius okguksa dks vU; m)s'; ds fy, yksd ekxZ ij pykus ds fy, vf/kd`r ugha gksaxsA

¶43

rn~uqlkj ;kfpdk o fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶44

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶45

25/VISHAL SHARMA

Sahad S/O Shri Deenu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sahad S/O Shri Deenu v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra S/O Devilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal Stone Crushing Company Vs State of Rajasthan

Farukh Khan Son of Ilyash Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajkumar Son of Shri Ramnarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Sheela Devi Wife of Shri Jethanand Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep @ Nikku S/O Dharampal Vs State of Rajasthan