Disposed

Mahendra S/O Devilal v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC6 Jul 2026CW/11298/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against suspension of petitioners' vehicle registration certificates by the Mining and Geology Department on grounds of overloading or alteration without notice. Court disposed of the petition directing the competent authority to hear the parties within a week and decide within two weeks; vehicles not to be used otherwise during the period.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed: hearing before competent authority within one week; orders within two weeks; no other use of vehicles meanwhile.

Mahendra S/O Devilal Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24965]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11298/2026

¶4

URN: CW / 25046U / 2026

¶5

Mahendra S/o Devilal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No.13, Sanwalsar Deidaspura, (Suratgarh) District Ganganagar (Vehicle No. Rj13-Gc-1913 And Rj13-Gc1476)

¶6

Shree Balaji Transport, Ward No.13, Sanwalsar Deidaspura, (Suratgarh) District Ganganagar Through Proprietor Mahendra S/o Devilal, Aged 32 Years, R/o Ward No.13, Sanwalsar Deidaspura, (Suratgarh) District Ganganagar (Vehicle No. Rj13-Gc-5345)

¶7

----Petitioners

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Transport Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶10

Joint Secretary, Department Of Mining And Geology, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur

¶11

Regional Transport Officer, Jaipur-Ii

¶12

Regional Transport Officer, Sikar

¶13

District Transport Officer, Sikar

¶14

District Transport Officer, Jaipur

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Punia For Respondent(s) : Mr. S S Naruka, AAG with Ms. Ritika Naruka, AAAG Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar

¶17

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA

¶18

Order

¶19

06/07/2026

¶20

;kphx.k dh vksj ls ;g fjV ;kfpdk [kku ,oa HkwfoKku foHkkx }kjk tkjh bZ&joUuk ls ;kph ds okguksa ds vf/kd Hkkj (Overloading)@cnyko (alteration) ds vk/kkj ij] fcuk uksfVl fn, muds okgu dk iath;u izek.k&i=

(2 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:24965]

[CW-11298/2026]

(Registration Certificate) fuyfEcr (suspend) fd, tkus ds vkns'k ls O;fFkr gksdj bl vuqrks"k ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gS %&

¶25

"It is, therefore, humble prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and may be further be pleased to call for the entire record of the case and by way of appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, thereby, issue the necessary direction(s) to the respondents :-

¶26

(i) respondents be directed to remove the suspension of registration certificate of the vehicles of the petitioners;

¶27

(ii) Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be given in favour of the Petitioner.

¶28

(iii) cost of writ petition may also be awarded in favour of petitioner."

¶29

v;kph@foHkkx dh vksj ls vkt fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk Jh ,l-,l-u:dk vfxze uksfVl ij mifLFkr gSa] mUgsa ;kfpdk dh izfr miyC/k djkbZ xbZA

¶30

nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us izdV fd;k fd bl ekeys eas tks iz'u vUroZfyr (involve) gS] ogh leku iz'u bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk U;kf;d fu.kZ; Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. No. 9721 rFkk Mustak and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. 20073/2025 esa fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% mDr fu.kZ;ksa ds izdk'k esa gh bl izdj.k dks Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶31

fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh lhfer izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g fjV ;kfpdk bl funsZ'k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd ;kphx.k vius&vius okguksa rFkk tokc lfgr lEcfU/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ¼ftuds }kjk muds okguksa dk iath;u izek.k&i= fuyfEcr fd;k x;k gS½] ds le{k bl vkns'k dh frfFk ls ,d

¶32

(3 of 3) [CW-11298/2026]

¶33

[2026:RJ-JP:24965]

¶34

LkIrkg ds Hkhrj vko';d :i ls mifLFkr gksaxsA rri'pkr l{ke vf/kdkjh }kjk nks lIrkg dh vof/k esa lquokbZ dj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk;sxkA

¶35

lacaf/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ds le{k lR;kiu@fujh{k.k gsrq okgu ys tkus ds vfrfjDr ;kphx.k mDr vof/k ds nkSjku vius&vius okguksa dks vU; m)s'; ds fy, yksd ekxZ ij pykus ds fy, vf/kd`r ugha gksaxsA

¶36

rn~uqlkj ;kfpdk o fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶37

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶38

25/VISHAL SHARMA

Mahendra S/O Devilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra S/O Devilal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Radhika Gupta W/O Late Rohit Gupta Vs Mandeep Lamba S/O Rampal Lamba

Banwari Lal S/O Kalyan Vs the State of Rajasthan

Kailash Saini Vs Smt. Chhota Devi W/O Late Shri Kaluram Saini

Farukh Khan Son of Ilyash Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vishal Stone Crushing Company Vs State of Rajasthan

Rajkumar Son of Shri Ramnarayan Vs State of Rajasthan