Disposed

Babulal S/O Ruparam v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jul 2026CW/10929/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of the writ petition regarding suspension of vehicle registration certificates due to overloading, following precedents Kanwar Singh and Mustak. It directed the concerned transport authorities to hear the petitioners within one month and pass a final order within two months, while prohibiting them from using the vehicles for hire or carrying goods during this period.

What did the court decide?

Direction to hearing within one month and final order within two months; interim prohibition on commercial use of vehicles.

Babulal S/O Ruparam Vs State of Rajasthan — Motor Accident Claims | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24674]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10929/2026 URN: CW / 24249U / 2026

¶4

Babulal S/o Ruparam, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Madh, Bikaner, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 07 Gc 2304

¶5

Najamuddin S/o Ibra, R/o Vill. Silkhoh 59, Tehsil Taoru, Nuh, Mewat, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 74 B 5529

¶6

Sufiyan Bms, 156, Idgah Colony, Jagarpura Kho Nagoriyan, Mewat, Haryana, Through It's Proprietor Mohammad Sahun S/o Sahabudeen, R/o Meoli Kalan, Meoli (118), Mewat, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 55 Aj 2191

¶7

Taheer Khan S/o Fazru Deen, R/o Dhunela (182), Gurgaon, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 55 Al 0095

¶8

Uday Bir S/o Dharambir, R/o H.no. 20, Bar Gujar (156), Gurugram, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 55 Ak 0378

¶9

M/s Idu Khan Contractors, Ferozpur Tijara Road, Neemli, Tehsil Tijara, District Alwar, Through Proprietor Idu S/o Dilavar, R/o Kholi Bas, Neemli, Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Ga 5481

¶10

Tasleem Trading Company, Sancholi (205), Gurgaon, Haryana, Through Proprietor Tasleem S/o Fate Mohammed, R/o Sancholi (205), Gurgaon, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 55 Ak 9146

¶11

Mohammad Sadeek S/o Kheru Khan, R/o Ward No. 8, Ballar, Bikaner, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 07 Gd 5502

¶12

Rafik S/o Aasu, R/o Joriya, Post Joria, District Alwar, Rajasthan, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Rj 40 Gb 7015

¶13

Rakesh Sharma S/o Shankar Lal, R/o 205, Sancholi, Bhiruti, Sohna, Gurgugram, Haryana, Registered Owner Of Vehicle Registration No. Hr 55 Al 9074

----Petitioners

[2026:RJ-JP:24674]

[CW-10929/2026]

(2 of 3)

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary.

¶20

Department Of Mining And Geology, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Joint Secretary.

¶21

Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶22

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Bharatpur, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan).

¶23

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Alwar, District Alwar (Rajasthan).

¶24

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Jaipur First, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).

¶25

Regional Transport Officer, Rto Office Bikaner, District Bikaner (Rajasthan).

¶26

District Transport Officer, Dto Office Kotputli, District Kotputl-Behror (Rajasthan).

¶27

----Respondents

¶28

For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Rajni Vyas For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S.Naruka AAG with Mr. Anshuman Singh

¶29

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SHUBHA MEHTA Order

¶30

03/07/2026

¶31

;kphx.k dh vksj ls ;g fjV ;kfpdk [kku ,oa HkwfoKku foHkkx }kjk tkjh bZ&joUuk ls ;kph ds okguksa ds vf/kd Hkkj (Overloading)@cnyko (alteration) ds vk/kkj ij] fcuk uksfVl fn, muds okgu dk iath;u izek.k&i= (Registration Certificate) fuyfEcr (suspend) fd, tkus ds vkns'k ls O;fFkr gksdj bl vuqrks"k ds lkFk izLrqr dh xbZ gS %&

¶32

"It is, therefore, humble prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and may be further be pleased to call for the entire record of the case and by way of appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:24674]

[CW-10929/2026]

thereof, theeby, issue the necessary direction(s) to the respondents :-

¶37

(i) respondents be directed to revoke the suspension of registration certificate of the vehicles of the petitioners;

¶38

(ii) cost of writ petition may also be awarded in favour of petitioner,

¶39

(iii)and may pass any other order (s) which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the Case."

¶40

v;kph@foHkkx dh vksj ls vkt fo}ku vfrfjDr egkf/koDrk Jh ,l-,l-u:dk vfxze uksfVl ij mifLFkr gSa] mUgsa ;kfpdk dh izfr miyC/k djkbZ xbZA

¶41

nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k us izdV fd;k fd bl ekeys eas tks iz'u vUroZfyr (involve) gS] ogh leku iz'u bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk U;kf;d fu.kZ; Kanwar Singh & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. No. 9721 rFkk Mustak and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. S.B.C.W.P. 20073/2025 esa fuLrkfjr fd;k tk pqdk gSA vr% mDr fu.kZ;ksa ds izdk'k esa gh bl izdj.k dks Hkh fuLrkfjr fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA

¶42

fopkj fd;k x;kA izdj.k ds rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa rFkk nksuksa i{kksa ds fo}ku vf/koDrkx.k dh lhfer izkFkZuk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, ;g fjV ;kfpdk bl funsZ'k ds lkFk fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd ;kphx.k vius&vius okguksa rFkk tokc lfgr lEcfU/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ¼ftuds }kjk muds okguksa dk iath;u izek.k&i= fuyfEcr fd;k x;k gS½] ds le{k bl vkns'k dh frfFk ls ,d LkIrkg ds Hkhrj vko';d :i ls mifLFkr gksaxsA rri'pkr l{ke vf/kdkjh }kjk nks lIrkg dh vof/k esa lquokbZ dj vkns'k ikfjr fd;k tk;sxkA

¶43

lacaf/kr ftyk ifjogu vf/kdkjh@l{ke vf/kdkjh ds le{k lR;kiu@fujh{k.k gsrq okgu ys tkus ds vfrfjDr ;kphx.k mDr vof/k ds nkSjku vius&vius okguksa dks vU; m)s'; ds fy, yksd ekxZ ij pykus ds fy, vf/kd`r ugha gksaxsA rn~uqlkj ;kfpdk o fofo/k izkFkZuki=] ;fn dksbZ yfEcr gks] rks fuLrkfjr fd, tkrs gSaA

¶44

(SHUBHA MEHTA),J

¶45

2/AJAY KUMAR SINGHAL/712

Babulal S/O Ruparam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Babulal S/O Ruparam v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagwandas S/O Babulal Vs Shivcharan S/O Shri Kalluram

Ramulal Saini S/O Shri Ramjilal Saini Vs Pankaj Jain S/O Shri Aadesh Kumar Jain

Pranaydev S/O Shri Jitendra Dubey Vs Sudha Mittal W/O Shri Anil Mittal

Rajendra Kumar Parnami S/O Late Shri Parmanand Parnami Vs Trilochan Singh S/O Late Shri Mahendra Singh

Smt. Niharika Singh D/O Late Shri Bhomandal Chouhan, Vs Shri Hitesh Rao S/O Shri Gokul Singh Rao

Kamlesh Agarwal Vs Ms Chhuttan Lal Agarwal and Ors.