Dismissed¶27

Bhagwandas S/O Babulal v. Shivcharan S/O Shri Kalluram

Rajasthan HC2 Jul 2026CW/8198/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CW-8198/2026 / [2026:RJ-JP:24524], Rajasthan High Court (Jaipur Bench), Justice Sudesh Bansal, order dated 02/07/2026. Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner Bhagwandas had challenged the order dated 11.03.2026 of the Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alwar dismissing his application under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC; execution proceedings culminated and the decree was executed during pendency, making the challenge infructuous. Respondents included Shivcharan, Smt. Uttara, and the heirs of the late Omprakash (Sanjay/Tiger, Raju/Rajkumar, Sunil, Kusumlata/Gauri). No merits decided; no precedent cases engaged.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication on merits; stay and pending applications disposed of. ¶27

Bhagwandas S/O Babulal Vs Shivcharan S/O Shri Kalluram — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24524]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8198/2026

¶4

URN: CW / 18021U / 2026

¶5

Bhagwandas S/o Babulal, R/o Near Ashok Takiz, Hanuman Temple, Alwar.

¶6

----Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Shivcharan S/o Shri Kalluram, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Village Mannotkalan Tehsil Nagar District Bharatpur.

¶9

Smt. Uttara W/o Punamchand Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o House No. 1 P 4 Stc Housing Board, Bharapur.

¶10

Omprakash Adopted Son Of Balakdas Sharma, R/o Near Ashok Takiz Hanuman Temple Alwar (Deceased)

¶11

3/1. Sanjay Alias Tiger, Aged About 49 Years, S/o Late Omprakash

¶12

3/2. Raju Alias Rajkumar, Aged About 45 Years, S/o Late Omprakash

¶13

3/3. Sunil S/o Late Omprakash, Aged About 43 Years, All Are R/o Near Ashok Takiz Hanuman Temple Alwar.

¶14

3/4. Kusumlata Alias Gauri W/o Mukesh Kumar, R/o Village Kasoda Tehsil Sab Tehsil Jalsu District Bharatpur Raj.

¶15

----Respondents

¶16

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yogesh Pujari for Mr. D.P. Pujari For Respondent(s) :

¶17

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL

¶18

Order

¶19

02/07/2026

¶20

Petitioner filed instant writ petition, challenging the order dated 11.03.2026 passed by the Court of Senior Civil Judge and Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alwar, dismissing his application filed under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC.

¶21

Counsel for petitioner states that during course of present petition, execution proceedings have been finally culminated and decree has been executed, hence, the challenge made in the writ

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:24524]

[CW-8198/2026]

petition has rendered infructuous, therefore, petitioner does not want to press this writ petition on merits and seeks permission to withdraw the same.

¶26

Permission is granted.

¶27

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶28

Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶29

(SUDESH BANSAL),J

¶30

Sachin Sharma/ 6

Bhagwandas S/O Babulal v. Shivcharan S/O Shri Kalluram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwandas S/O Babulal v. Shivcharan S/O Shri Kalluram

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babulal S/O Devi Sahai Vs Raghunath Goshala

Sushil Kumar Bhoot S/O Late Kedar Nath Bhoot Vs Krishna Avtar Bhoot S/O Late Kedar Nath Bhoot

Brahm Singh S/O Late Sh. Nabav Vs Mukesh Singh S/O Late Sh. Nabav

Pranaydev S/O Shri Jitendra Dubey Vs Sudha Mittal W/O Shri Anil Mittal

Ramulal Saini S/O Shri Ramjilal Saini Vs Pankaj Jain S/O Shri Aadesh Kumar Jain

Rajendra Kumar Parnami S/O Late Shri Parmanand Parnami Vs Trilochan Singh S/O Late Shri Mahendra Singh