Disposed¶6

Kashish Bairwa D/O Prabhudayal Bairwa, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Jan 2026CRLW/14/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court Jaipur; CRLW 14/2026; protection of married couple; life and liberty; Arya Samaj marriage dated 17.12.2025; marriage registered Kishanpole Zone Jaipur; threats from private respondents Prabhudayal Bairwa and Tulsi Devi Bairwa; direction to SHO Police Station Sanganer to provide protection; writ petition disposed of; no effect on civil/criminal proceedings; single-judge bench (Anil Kumar Upman, J.).

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to apply for protection before the SHO, Police Station Sanganer (respondent No. 5); the SHO directed to provide protection upon such application and ensure no harm is caused to the petitioners. ¶6

Kashish Bairwa D/O Prabhudayal Bairwa, Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶6

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioners, a married couple apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents Nos. 6 and 7, are entitled to police protection.

¶3

Court's answer

The petitioners are directed to file an appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No. 5, the Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur.

¶5

Ratio / Principle

Respondent No. 5 (SHO, Police Station Sanganer) is directed to provide protection to the petitioners if any application is filed before him, and to ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

¶5

Key takeaways

The Court clarified that its order will not affect any civil or criminal proceedings, if any, in the matter.ratio¶8

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Criminal Writ Petition (S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 14/2026, High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur; Anil Kumar Upman, J.; order dated 08/01/2026) filed by a young married couple — Kashish Bairwa (aged about 20) and Pintu (aged about 25) — seeking protection from private respondents Nos. 6 and 7 (Prabhudayal Bairwa and Tulsi Devi Bairwa). Counsel stated the petitioners married as per Hindu rites and customs at Arya Samaj Moti Katala, Jaipur on 17.12.2025, the marriage was registered with the Marriage Registration Officer, Kishanpole Zone, Jaipur, and the petitioners were receiving continuous threats from the private respondents. The Court directed the petitioners to file an appropriate protection application before respondent No. 5, the SHO, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur, and directed that SHO to provide protection if such application is filed and to ensure no harm is caused to the petitioners. The writ petition was disposed of; stay and pending applications stood disposed of; and the Court clarified that the order would not affect any civil or criminal proceedings in the matter.

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:679]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 14/2026

¶4

Kashish Bairwa D/o Prabhudayal Bairwa, aged about 20 Years, R/o Plot No. 50, Purana Gaon, Fatehpura Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

Pintu S/o Raghuveer, aged about 25 Years, R/o Dhanwara, Bharatpur, Rajasthan

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.

¶9

The Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.I. Road, Jaipur.

¶10

The SHO, Police Station Vidyadhar Nagar, District Jaipur.

¶11

The SHO, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur. 6. Prabhudayal Bairwa S/o Revadmal Bairwa, Residing At 59, Puran Gaon, Fatehpur Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶12

Tulsi Devi Bairwa W/o Prabhudayal Bairwa, Residing At 59, Puran Gaon, Fatehpur Vatika, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶13

----Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Vishnu Kumar Sharma for
	Mr. Nikhlesh Katara
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Amit Punia,PP

¶15

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN

¶16

Order

¶17

08/01/2026

¶18

Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled.

¶19

Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly

¶20

been identified by their counsel.

¶21

This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.6 and 7 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:679]

[CRLW-14/2026]

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Moti Katala Jaipur on 17.12.2025 and same has been registered in the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Kishanpole Zone, Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.6 and 7 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.

¶26

In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.5-Station House Officer, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur and respondent no.5 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.

¶27

The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶28

Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

¶29

However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.

¶30

(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J

¶31

LALIT MOHAN /361

Kashish Bairwa D/O Prabhudayal Bairwa, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kashish Bairwa D/O Prabhudayal Bairwa, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kalyan Sahay @ Ramkalyan S/O Late Shri Badrinarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Vijaysingh S/O Shri Ramgilas Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishan Lal Yadav Son of Sohan Lal Yadav Vs State of Rajasthan

Sharwan Kumar Vishnoi S/O Khammuram Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt Vinita Sharma W/O Shri Ramswaroop Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Banwari Son of Malaram Vs State of Rajasthan