Bail application withdrawn by the petitioner after argument; court permitted withdrawal with liberty to renew the bail prayer after recording of the seizure officer's testimony, and directed the trial court to record that testimony on priority basis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[2026:RJ-JP:355]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2922/2025
Kalyan Sahay @ Ramkalyan S/o Late Shri Badrinarayan, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Bhatt Ka Bas, Police Thana Raisar District Jaipur Presently Meena Medical Store Raisar, Police Station Raisar, District Jaipur Raj.
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
----Respondent
| For Petitioner(s) | : Dr. Vibhuti Bhushan Sharma with |
|---|---|
| Ms. Anindya Gupta | |
| Ms. Suman Kalal | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. Amit Punia,PP |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order
07/01/2026
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to renew the prayer for bail after recording testimony of the seizure officer.
Permission as sought for is granted.
Accordingly, the instant bail application is dismissed as
withdrawn with liberty, as prayed for.
Learned trial Court is directed to record the testimony of the seizure officer on priority basis.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J
CHARU SONI /15
Kalyan Sahay @ Ramkalyan
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
Anil Kumar Upman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
