Dismissed

Suresh Kumar Gupta S/O Late Shri Bhanwar Mal Gupta, v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC11 May 2026CRLMP/2650/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court dismissed criminal miscellaneous petitions as infructuous after the investigation officer classified the case as civil in nature and proposed a negative final report. The court directed submission of a conclusive investigation report.

What did the court decide?

All criminal miscellaneous petitions dismissed as infructuous; direction to IO to submit conclusion report; liberty to complainant for remedies and petitioners to revive petitions if negative report i

Suresh Kumar Gupta S/O Late Shri Bhanwar Mal Gupta… — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:19837]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1044/2024

¶4

Bhuraram Choudhary S/o Late Shri Gangaram Choudhary, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 143-A, Doctor Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Prithviraj Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶8

Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (South), Commissionerate, Government Hostel Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan.

¶9

S.h.o. Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan.

¶10

----Respondents

¶11

Connected With

¶12

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2494/2022 Sunil Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Chhitarmal Gupta, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Reengus Road, Ward No. 9, Near Chungi Naka, Chomu, District Jaipur.

¶13

----Petitioner

¶14

Versus

¶15

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶16

Bhoora Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Gangaram Choudhary, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 143-A, Doctor Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Prathvi Raj Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.

¶17

----Respondents

¶18

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2650/2022

¶19

Suresh Kumar Gupta S/o Late Shri Bhanwar Mal Gupta, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ward No. 9 , New Colony, Near Fire Brigade Centre, Reengus Road, Chomu, District Jaipur.

¶20

----Petitioner

¶21

Versus

¶22

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.

¶23

Bhoora Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Gangaram Choudhary, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 143-A, Doctor Rajendra Prasad

¶24

(2 of 3) [CRLMP-1044/2024]

¶25

[2026:RJ-JP:19837]

¶26

Nagar, Prathvi Raj Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.

¶27

----Respondents

¶28

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi
	Mr. Ashish Gauringa
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Seema Shekhar

¶29

JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND

¶30

Order

¶31

11/05/2026

¶32

The S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.2494/2022 and 2650/2022 have been submitted by the accused-petitioners for quashing the impugned FIR No.51/2021 registered with the Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC. While the S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1044/2024 has been submitted by the complainant-petitioner for issuing directions to the Investigating Officer to conduct fair and impartial investigation of the aforesaid case. 2. At the very outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court on the basis of the factual report dated 14.04.2026 received from the Station House Officer, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur (South) that after investigation, the Police has found the instant case is of civil nature and has proposed Final Report (Negative). He further submits that the matter is still awaiting orders of the Commissioner of Police and immediately after receiving the orders of the Commissioner of Police, appropriate report would be submitted before the concerned Court.

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:19837]

[CRLMP-1044/2024]

Considering the contents of the factual report and looking to the fact that after investigation, the Police has found the present matter as civil in nature, all the instant criminal misc. petitions have become infructuous.

¶37

Accordingly, all the instant criminal misc. petitions stand dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. 5. The Investigating Officer is directed to submit conclusion report of the investigation before the concerned Court expeditiously, as early as possible.

¶38

In case, the Final Report (Negative) is submitted, the complainant-petitioner would be at liberty to avail the remedies available to him under the law. In case, Final Report (Negative) is not submitted, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an application for revival of the instant petitions.

¶39

(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J

¶40

KuD/49-51

Suresh Kumar Gupta S/O Late Shri Bhanwar Mal Gupta, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar Gupta S/O Late Shri Bhanwar Mal Gupta, v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saisuda Chuennok ( Citizen of Thailand), Vs Union of India

Heeralal S/O Gaurishanker Vs State of Rajasthan

Smt. Feroza Coelho W/O Martin Coelho @ Jameel, Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhuraram Choudhary S/O Late Shri Gangaram Choudhary, Vs State of Rajasthan

Premchand Son of Shri Devi Lal, Vs State of Rajasthan

Manoj Gupta S/O Shri Satya Prakash Arya, Vs State of Rajasthan