Dinesh Bagari S/O Shri Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Dinesh Bagari S/O Shri Omprakash Vs State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Bail application allowed; petitioner to be enlarged on bail on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, subject to stipulation to appear before the trial Court or any transferee Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon.

Issue for consideration

Whether the petitioner, arraigned in F.I.R. No.45/2025 of P.S. Special Police Station- SOG (District ATS & SOG) for offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and the Banning of Unregulated Deposited Scheme Act, 2019, and in custody since 20.09.2025, should be enlarged on bail, particularly in view of the co-accused Director having already been enlarged on bail.

Court's answer

Having considered the allegation against the petitioner, the case-diary evidence collected against him, the fact that the co-accused under whom the petitioner was working had already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench, and the petitioner's custody since 20.09.2025, the Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deemed it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Ratio / Principle

The petitioner is to be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Bail granted under Section 483 B.N.S.S. to Dinesh Bagari, an employee of Harvest AI Technology Pvt. Ltd. acting under the Director's instructions, arraigned in F.I.R. No.45/2025 of P.S. Special Police Station- SOG, District ATS & SOG, for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 & 21 of the Banning of Unregulated Deposited Scheme Act, 2019. Weighing the case-diary evidence, the parity that the co-accused Director had already been enlarged on bail by a Co-ordinate Bench (order dated 18.12.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14489/2025), and custody since 20.09.2025, the Court enlarged the petitioner on bail expressly without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, on a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, with an appearance stipulation before the trial Court or any transferee Court.

[2026:RJ-JP:2287]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 76/2026

Dinesh Bagari S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Chowk Ka Bas, Maliyo Ka Mohalla, Jodhpur Chowki, Merta City, P.s. Merta City, District Nagaur (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur).

----Petitioner

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s)	:	Mr. J.R. Choudhary
		Mr. Dinesh Sohu
For Respondent(s)	:	Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. with
		Mr. Rohit Srivastava, Dy.S.P., S.O.G.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA

Order

19/01/2026

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.45/2025 registered with the Police Station Special Police Station- SOG, District ATS & SOG for offence under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 & 21 of Banning of Unregulated Deposited Scheme Act, 2019.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner was only an employee in Harvest AI Technology Pvt. Ltd. Company and was acting under the

[2026:RJ-JP:2287]

[CRLMB-76/2026]

(2 of 3)

instruction of the Director of the Company. He further submits that the Director of the said Company, who is also an accused, has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.12.2025, in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14489/2025. He further submits that the accusedpetitioner is in custody since 20.09.2025 and trial of the case will take time to conclude, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor.

Having considered the allegation against the petitioner and after going through the case diary as regard the evidence collected against him and more particularly the fact that coaccused under whom the petitioner was working, has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this case and the accused-petitioner is in custody since 20.09.2025, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before

[2026:RJ-JP:2287]

[CRLMB-76/2026]

(3 of 3)

that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do

so.

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

ARTI SHARMA /221