Allowed

Wasim S/O Ajmuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC3 Jul 2026CRLMB/7580/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under Section 483 BNSS for offences under BNS Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 112(2), 61(2)(a) and Section 66D IT Act. Considering custody since 29.04.2026, absence of criminal antecedents and delay in trial, the court enlarged the petitioner on bail with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each, with conditions of appearance and no further offences.

Wasim S/O Ajmuddin Vs State of Rajasthan — Anticipatory Bail | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24727]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7580/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13802U / 2026

¶4

Wasim S/o Ajmuddin, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village Selu, Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Shivam Kumar Sharma
	Mr. Nadeem Abbasi
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order

¶11

03/07/2026

¶12

This instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 85/2026 registered at Police Station Kundera, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2), 112(2) & 61(2)(a) of BNS and under Section 66D of IT Act.

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that accused-petitioner is behind the bars since long; conclusion of trial may take considerable time, and no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

[2026:RJ-JP:24727]

[CRLMB-7580/2026]

(2 of 3)

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the contentions preferred by the learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner but did not dispute the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner.

¶18

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and rival contentions advanced by the learned counsel for both the parties; and the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet; particularly keeping in view the fact that accusedpetitioner is in custody since 29.04.2026; that there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶19

Therefore, this instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Wasim S/o Ajmuddin is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail. 7. In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

[2026:RJ-JP:24727]

[CRLMB-7580/2026]

(3 of 3)

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶25

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶26

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶27

32/SHIVANI

Wasim S/O Ajmuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Wasim S/O Ajmuddin v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahrukh Khan S/O Shri Kalu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Sanjay Vs State of Rajasthan

Sanjay S/O Vijay Bahadur Vs the State of Rajasthan

Ranjeet S/O Maherchand Vs the State of Rajasthan

Teekam Singh Prajapat S/O Sh. Suwalal Prajapat Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sandeep @ Raja S/O Ajaypal Singh Vs State of Rajasthan