Allowed

Sanjay S/O Vijay Bahadur v. the State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC2 Jul 2026CRLMB/7013/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Section 483 BNSS for offences of cheating, impersonation and criminal conspiracy under BNS 2023 and Section 66D IT Act. Court granted bail considering custody since April 2026, filed charge-sheet, no criminal antecedents and trial delay.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Sanjay S/O Vijay Bahadur Vs the State of Rajasthan — Cheating and Forgery | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:24416]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7013/2026 URN: CRLMB / 12688U / 2026

¶4

Sanjay S/o Vijay Bahadur, R/o Todara Lodi, Police Station Rawanjanadungar District Sawaimadhopur Haal Tenant Purane Honda Showroom Ke Samne, Choth Ka Barwada District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined In District Jail Sawai Madhopur).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Rajasthan, Through P.P.

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

02/07/2026

¶13

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 80/2026 registered at Police Station Rawanjana Dungar, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4) & 61(2)(a) of B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act.

¶14

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore,

[2026:RJ-JP:24416]

[CRLMB-7013/2026]

(2 of 3)

prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶19

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the accusedpetitioner hereinabove but concurs with the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner.

¶20

Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the arguments put forth by the learned counsel for both the parties; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 24.04.2026; that the charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner has already been filed; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner; that the trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.

¶21

Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Sanjay S/o Vijay Bahadur is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶22

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any offence(s) during currency of the bail.

¶23

In case of any breach of the aforementioned condition, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application

[2026:RJ-JP:24416]

[CRLMB-7013/2026]

(3 of 3)

against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶28

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶29

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶30

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶31

PUNEET KUMAR/30

Sanjay S/O Vijay Bahadur v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay S/O Vijay Bahadur v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aasif Samsi S/O Aarif Samsi Vs State of Rajasthan

Sukhram Vishnoi S/O Shri Bhagirath Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Jatin Saini S/O Shri Om Prakash Saini Vs State of Rajasthan

Shahrukh Khan S/O Shri Kalu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Rahul S/O Sanjay Vs State of Rajasthan

Chuttan Lal S/O Bacchraj @ Bachhraj Vs the State of Rajasthan