Dismissed¶21

Kanhaiyalal S/O Lalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC14 Jul 2026CRLMB/5271/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5271/2026 (CRLMB); Justice Pramil Kumar Mathur; order dated 14/07/2026; anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous; complainant Kok Singh withdrew from FIR (application dated 29.04.2026); negative final report already submitted per IO's factual report; IO Vishnu Dutt (ASI, PS Saipau, District Dholpur) present in compliance with order dated 30.06.2026; petitioners Kanhaiyalal S/o Lalchand and Bhavesh S/o Kanhaiyalal; counsel Dinesh Kumar Garg and Kranti Anand for petitioners; PP Jaiprakash Tiwari for State; liberty reserved to file fresh anticipatory bail application.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application, if the circumstances so arise ¶21

Kanhaiyalal S/O Lalchand Vs State of Rajasthan — Rajasthan HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:26671]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5271/2026 URN: CRLMB / 9423U / 2026

¶4

Kanhaiyalal S/o Lalchand, R/o Kolua, Tehsil Sainpau, District Dholpur (Raj.), Presently R/o P-125/5, Opposite Bjp Office, Doctor C.g. Road, Chamboor Colony, Mumbai (Maharastra).

¶5

Bhavesh S/o Kanhaiyalal, R/o Kolua, Tehsil Sainpau, District Dholpur (Raj.), Presently R/o P-125/5, Opposite Bjp Office, Doctor C.g. Road, Chamboor Colony, Mumbai (Maharastra).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg Ms. Kranti Anand
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP
	Mr. Vishnu Dutt, I.O. PS Saipau,
	District Dholpur

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR

¶12

Order

¶13

14/07/2026

¶14

In compliance with the order dated 30.06.2026, Mr. Vishnu Dutt, ASI, Police Station Saipau, District Dholpur is present before this Court.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has placed on record an application dated 29.04.2026 stating that the complainant-Kok Singh does not wish to pursue the FIR against the present petitioners.

(2 of 2)

[2026:RJ-JP:26671]

[CRLMB-5271/2026]

The Investigating Officer has also submitted a factual report, which is taken on record. The report makes it clear that a negative final report has already been submitted in the matter.

¶20

In view of the statement made by the Investigating Officer, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous as no cause of action survives.

¶21

However, the present anticipatory bail application is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioners shall be at liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application, if the circumstances so arise.

¶22

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶23

Chandan/65

Kanhaiyalal S/O Lalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kanhaiyalal S/O Lalchand v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lokesh S/O Satyanarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Lokesh S/O Satyanarayan Vs State of Rajasthan

Adil Ali @ Mota S/O Abdul Hakim Vs State of Rajasthan

Chandalal So Shri Mangilal Vs State of Rajasthan

Sriram S/O Shri Chittar Vs State of Rajasthan

Jagan S/O Shivcharan Vs State of Rajasthan