Allowed

Liyakat S/O Abdul v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC13 Jan 2026CRLMB/468/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-judge order granting anticipatory bail to two accused petitioners under CrPC Section 438. The High Court of Rajasthan held that as the petitioners had no previous forward application and were already in judicial custody, the statutory obligations for anticipatory bail are satisfied. The bail was allowed with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners upon satisfying statutory obligations and specific conditions of travel and cooperation.

Liyakat S/O Abdul Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:1327]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 468/2026

¶4

Liyakat S/o Abdul, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Jagdaka, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶5

Rijwan S/o Jamil, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jagdaka, Police Station Nagar, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Ankit Khandelwal
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Rhishiraj Singh Rathore, PP
	Assisted by
	Mr. Anirudh Singh

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶12

Order

¶13

13/01/2026

¶14

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq ;g tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ds varxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& uxj ftyk& Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk izfrosnu la[;k& 281@2024 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 319¼2½] 318¼2½] 338] 336¼3½] 340¼2½] 317¼5½] 303¼2½] 313] 61¼2½¼,½ Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 66Mh lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e esa is”k fd;k x;k gSA

¶15

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks izdj.k esa >wBk lac) fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 16-12-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA

[CRLMB-468/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:1327]

(2 of 2)

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A

¶20

fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) vkWuykbu ÝkWM dj yksxksa ls Bxh dj jkf”k izkIr djus dk vkjksi gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur vkosnu vLohdkj fd;k tk,A

¶21

cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶22

izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.kksa ij bl izØe ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;k tkuk visf{kr ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 16-12-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gSA vr% mijksDr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk tekur vkosnu Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; le>rk gw¡A

¶23

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- fy;kdr iq= vCnwy] 2- fjtoku iq= tehy dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj #i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o iPphl&iPphl gtkj #i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo”oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko”;drk u gks] rks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶24

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶25

RAMESHWAR PRASHAD /14

Liyakat S/O Abdul v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Liyakat S/O Abdul v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanraj S/O Kishanlal Vs State of Rajasthan

Bamboo Khan S/O Shri Supeda @ Sufed Vs State of Rajasthan

Sheeshram S/O Shri Munsi Vs the State of Rajasthan

Narendra Singh Vs State

Manbhari Devi W/O Gheesa Ram, Vs State of Rajasthan

Robdin @ Robin S/O Islam @ Bhambal Vs State of Rajasthan