Bhagwan Chhitarmal Mistri S/O Shri Chhitarmal Vs State of Rajasthan

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:2643]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 441/2026

¶4

Bhagwan Chhitarmal Mistri S/o Shri Chhitarmal, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Village Rampura (Thoi), Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sab Jail Neemkathana District Sikar).

¶5

Sushil Kumawat S/o Shri Okarmal Kumawat, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Village Garhi Khanpura, Tan Jugalpura, Tehsil Shrimadhopur District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sab Jail Neemkathana District Sikar).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. KK Bhinda
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP
	Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶12

21/01/2026

¶13

The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.263/2025 registered at Police Station Thoi, District Sikar for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 127(2), 307 and 333 BNS, 2023.

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that prior to the present incident, from the side of petitioner, several FIRs were lodged against the victim and owing

[2026:RJ-JP:2643]

[CRLMB-441/2026]

(2 of 2)

to this enmity, present FIR has been lodged solely on false and concocted grounds. He further submits that no injury has been specifically attributed to the present petitioners. The injuries allegedly sustained by the victim are on the legs, which do not constitute vital parts of the body. Petitioners are behind the bars since 04.12.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed.

¶20

Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Bhagwan Chhitarmal Mistri S/o Shri Chhitarmal and Sushil Kumawat S/o Shri Okarmal Kumawat, shall be released on bail on their furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for their appearance before the Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.

¶22

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶23

Chandan/111

Bhagwan Chhitarmal Mistri S/O Shri Chhitarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhagwan Chhitarmal Mistri S/O Shri Chhitarmal v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay S/O Sunil Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Tarif Son of Jameel Saal Vs State of Rajasthan

Aslam S/O Ramjan Vs State of Rajasthan

Kuldeep Choudhary S/O Surendra Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Gyarsilal Kumawat S/O Ramdev Kumawat Vs the State of Rajasthan

Suresh Nayak @ Pawna S/O Kalyan Nayak Vs State of Rajasthan