Mohammad Saddam S/O Mohammad Irshad Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:15790]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3389/2026

Mohammad Saddam S/o Mohammad Irshad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o 38/142, Choki Motikunj, Police Station Loha Mandi, District Agra, Uttar Pradesh. (At Preset Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶11

16/04/2026

¶12

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.14/2026 registered at Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 5, 6, 8 and 9 of RBA Act and Sections 11(1)(d) and 11(1)(f) of Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the transportation of a bovine animal; however, the name of the petitioner does not find mention in the FIR. It is contended that the petitioner has been implicated in the present case solely on the basis that the Fastag of the said truck was recharged by him.

[2026:RJ-JP:15790]

[CRLMB-3389/2026]

(2 of 3)

The petitioner is behind the bars since 08.02.2026. Though seven other cases have been registered against the petitioner but he has been granted bail in all of them. The present case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶19

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶20

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mohammad Saddam S/o Mohammad Irshad, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶22

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Bander Sindri, District Ajmer in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

¶23

[2026:RJ-JP:15790]

¶24

[CRLMB-3389/2026]

¶25

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

¶26

(iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future.

¶27

(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶28

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶29

Arun/19

Mohammad Saddam S/O Mohammad Irshad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Saddam S/O Mohammad Irshad v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tasveera Urf Kashmeera Vs State of Rajasthan

Dashrath S/O Mohar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Teekam Saras @ Golu S/O Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan

Gora W/O Pappu Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Shadab Alias Baccha S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif Vs State of Rajasthan

Dennis David S/O R.N. David Vs State of Rajasthan