Allowed

Mohammad Shadab Alias Baccha S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC16 Apr 2026CRLMB/3162/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Provisional bail allowed under Section 483 BNSS without expression of opinion on merits. Petitioner to execute personal bond and furnish two sureties. Conditions include monthly reporting to SHO and prohibition of repetition of offence. Bail liable to cancellation upon breach. Case involves offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(3) BNS, 2023 for alleged theft of ornaments.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each with conditions to appear before SHO every 15 days and not commit further offences.

Mohammad Shadab Alias Baccha S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif Vs… — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:15785]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3162/2026

¶4

Mohammad Shadab Alias Baccha S/o Shri Mohammad Hanif, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Fakrio Ki Masjid Ke Pass Kotdi, Police Station Gumanpura District Kota City Raj. (Presently Confined In District Jail Ajmer).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

	Versus
State Of Rajasthan,	Through Pp ----Respondent
For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Aman Ali
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Vivek Sharma,PP

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order

¶8

16/04/2026

¶9

The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.500/2025 registered at Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(3) of BNS, 2023.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is of stealing ornaments from the house of the complainant. The petitioner is behind bars since 30.12.2025, and eleven cases have been reported against him. The charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in

[2026:RJ-JP:15785]

[CRLMB-3162/2026]

(2 of 3)

further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.

¶16

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶17

On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.

¶18

Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Mohammad Shadab Alias Baccha S/o Shri Mohammad Hanif, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:-

¶19

(i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Nasirabad Sadar, District Ajmer in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial.

¶20

(ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:15785]

[CRLMB-3162/2026]

immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard.

¶25

(iii) The petitioner shall not repeat any offence in future.

¶26

(iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶27

(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J

¶28

Arun/18

Mohammad Shadab Alias Baccha S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohammad Shadab Alias Baccha S/O Shri Mohammad Hanif v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tasveera Urf Kashmeera Vs State of Rajasthan

Dashrath S/O Mohar Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Teekam Saras @ Golu S/O Jagdish Vs State of Rajasthan

Gora W/O Pappu Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Saddam S/O Mohammad Irshad Vs State of Rajasthan

Dennis David S/O R.N. David Vs State of Rajasthan