Allowed

Tareef S/O Ruddar v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC8 Apr 2026CRLMB/3305/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application filed under Section 483 BNSS in connection with offences under BNS. Petitioner submitted he was falsely implicated, had no antecedents, and co-accused were on bail. Court allowed bail without expressing opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Tareef S/O Ruddar Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:14656]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3305/2026

¶4

Tareef S/o Ruddar, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Tauvas, P.s. Kotkasim District Khairthal-Tijara (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In District Jail, Khairthal-Tijara).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Rajasthan, through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Aamir For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakad, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order

¶11

08/04/2026

¶12

This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 216/2025 registered at Police Station Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara for offences punishable u/S 318(4) & 319(2) of BNS.

¶13

Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He also submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 23.01.2026 and there is no criminal antecedent against the accused petitioner. He further submits that co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail, therefore the accused petitioner may be released on bail.

[2026:RJ-JP:14656]

[CRLMB-3305/2026]

(2 of 2)

Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application.

¶18

Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner so also the fact that no other criminal case pending against the accused petitioner and he is in custody since 23.01.2026, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶20

In case the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move application for cancellation of his bail.

¶21

(GANESH RAM MEENA),J

¶22

Gaurav Srivastava /61

Tareef S/O Ruddar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tareef S/O Ruddar v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prahlad Singh S/O Poor Singh Vs State of Rajasthan

Yusuf @ Isuf @ Daldi S/O Kamar Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Hasan S/O Sharif Mohammed Vs State of Rajasthan

Hemant Kumar S/O Prakash Vs State of Rajasthan

Guman Lal Panwar S/O Dudhalal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Sohanlal @ Sonu Balas S/O Malaram Vs State of Rajasthan