Allowed

Indarjeet @ Indarpaal S/O Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC10 Apr 2026CRLMB/3087/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sangeeta Sharma enlarged the accused-petitioner on bail in a bail application under Section 483 of BNSS. The court noted the charge-sheet, custody duration, and co-accused bail, ordering release without expressing an opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioner ordered to be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each.

Indarjeet @ Indarpaal S/O Ramdev Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:15099]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3087/2026

¶4

Indarjeet @ Indarpaal S/o Ramdev, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 20 K. Patan, Police Station - K. Patan, District Bundi (Raj.) (Accused Confined In District Jail At Bundi).

¶5

----Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

10/04/2026

¶13

This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accusedpetitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 365/2025 registered at Police Station Keshorai Patan, District Bundi for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) & 110 of BNS, in which charge-sheet has been submitted under Sections 190, 191(3), 115(2), 126(2), 117(2) & 110 BNS.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case; charge-sheet has been filed; He further submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 07.02.2026; injuries sustained by the injured neither fatal nor dangerous to life. He further contends that similarly situated coaccused persons namely Ramraj and Pawan Kumar have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.01.2026 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 16437/2025; trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose

[2026:RJ-JP:15099]

[CRLMB-3087/2026]

(2 of 3)

would be served by keeping the petitioner behind the bars, and, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.

¶19

Per contra , learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that five other criminal antecedents are registered against the accused-petitioner. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that charge-sheet has been filed; petitioner is behind the bars since 07.02.2026; similarly situated co-accused persons namely Ramraj and Pawan Kumar have been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶20

Therefore, this bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Indarjeet @ Indarpaal S/o Ramdev is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve himself in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence on 1^st and 15^th day of every month in the concerned police station.

[2026:RJ-JP:15099]

[CRLMB-3087/2026]

(3 of 3)

In case of any breach of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court.

¶26

The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.

¶27

Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.

¶28

(SANGEETA SHARMA),J

¶29

SHIVANI/34

Indarjeet @ Indarpaal S/O Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indarjeet @ Indarpaal S/O Ramdev v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohammed Salim @ Abba S/O Abdul Halim Vs State of Rajasthan

Shajaad Mohammad S/O Chand Mohd. Vs the State of Rajasthan

Manoj Gurjar S/O Lalchand, Vs State of Rajasthan

Kishanlal S/O Jagdish Prasad Vs State of Rajasthan

Mohammad Ali S/O Chotu Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Manjeet W/O Indarjeet Vs State of Rajasthan