Asif S/O Shri Baidulla Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

Asif S/O Shri Baidulla Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Both accused-petitioners (Saleem S/o Saddik and Asif S/o Shri Baidulla) enlarged on bail in connection with FIR No.35/2026, subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge.

Issue for consideration

Whether accused-petitioners Saleem and Asif, arrested in connection with FIR No.35/2026 (Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar) for offences under Sections 61(2), 240, 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act, should be enlarged on bail under Section 483 BNSS.

Court's answer

After considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court deemed it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail, expressly without expressing anything on the merits of the case.

Ratio / Principle

Both bail applications under Section 483 BNSS were allowed; the accused-petitioners namely Saleem S/o Saddik and Asif S/o Shri Baidulla shall be enlarged on bail in connection with FIR No.35/2026 provided they furnish a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge, and appear before the court concerned on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Rajasthan HC (Jaipur Bench), Justice Praveer Bhatnagar, Order dated 17/04/2026: Connected S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Applications Nos. 3037/2026 (Saleem s/o Saddik) and 3038/2026 (Asif s/o Baidulla), filed under Section 483 BNSS, ALLOWED. Accused-petitioners, arrested in connection with FIR No.35/2026, Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, for offences under Sections 61(2), 240, 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act, enlarged on bail without expressing anything on the merits of the case, subject to a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, satisfactory to the learned trial Judge, with appearance on all dates of hearing.

[2026:RJ-JP:16241]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3037/2026

Saleem S/o Saddik, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kalsavda Baas, Police Station Naugava, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

Connected With

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3038/2026

Asif S/o Shri Baidulla, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Anchbadi, Police Station Chandraka, District Nuh (Hariyana) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar).

----Petitioner

Versus

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)

: Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda, Adv. : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

Order

17/04/2026

These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accusedpetitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.35/2026 registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Sections 61(2), 240, 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act.

[2026:RJ-JP:16241]

[CRLMB-3037/2026]

(2 of 2)

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and they are in custody since long. It is further contended that there is no transfer of money in the petitioners' accounts and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Saleem S/o Saddik and 2. Asif S/o Shri Baidulla, in connection with FIR No.35/2026, registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for there appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-31-32