Allowed¶28

Saleem S/O Saddik v. the State of Rajasthan

Bail – Section 483 BNSS – FIR No.35/2026, Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar

Rajasthan HC17 Apr 2026CRLMB/3037/2026

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rajasthan High Court, Jaipur Bench; S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Applications No.3037/2026 and No.3038/2026 (connected), decided 17/04/2026 by Justice Praveer Bhatnagar; bail allowed under Section 483 BNSS to Saleem S/o Saddik and Asif S/o Shri Baidulla in FIR No.35/2026, P.S. Nouganwa, District Alwar (offences under BNS Ss.61(2), 240, 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) and IT Act Ss.66C, 66D); personal bond Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each; no expression on merits.

What did the court decide?

Accused-petitioners enlarged on bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge. ¶28

Saleem S/O Saddik Vs the State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:16241]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No.3037/2026

¶4

Saleem S/o Saddik, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Kalsavda Baas, Police Station Naugava, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar).

¶5

----Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

Connected With

¶10

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3038/2026

¶11

Asif S/o Shri Baidulla, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Anchbadi, Police Station Chandraka, District Nuh (Hariyana) (At Present In Central Jail, Alwar).

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

For Petitioner(s) For Respondent(s)

¶17

: Mr. Surendra Singh Sunda, Adv. : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP

¶18

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶19

Order

¶20

17/04/2026

¶21

These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accusedpetitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.35/2026 registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, for the offence(s) under Sections 61(2), 240, 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2) of BNS and Sections 66C and 66D of IT Act.

[2026:RJ-JP:16241]

[CRLMB-3037/2026]

(2 of 2)

Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the charge-sheet has already been submitted, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and they are in custody since long. It is further contended that there is no transfer of money in the petitioners' accounts and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.

¶26

Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

¶27

Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail.

¶28

Accordingly, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely; 1. Saleem S/o Saddik and 2. Asif S/o Shri Baidulla, in connection with FIR No.35/2026, registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar, shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for there appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶29

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶30

Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-31-32

Saleem S/O Saddik v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saleem S/O Saddik v. the State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tofik S/O Neta Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Mahendra Singh Yadav @ Chotu S/O Shri Gokula Prasad Yadav Vs the State of Rajasthan

Dayashankar S/O Shri Gokulram Vs State of Rajasthan

Vinod @ Guliya @ Guddu @ Vikas S/O Mukesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan

Asif S/O Shri Baidulla Vs the State of Rajasthan

Rachna @ Usha D/O Kalluram W/O Khushiram Vs the State of Rajasthan