Debilal Nath S/O Laxman Nath @ Naru Vs State of Rajasthan

[2026:RJ-JP:25724]

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2811/2026 URN: CRLMB / 4988U / 2026

Debilal Nath S/o Laxman Nath @ Naru, R/o Village Aama, Police Station Badliyas, Distt. Bhilwada. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined At Central Jail Ajmer).

¶5

---Accused-Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

State Of Rajasthan, Through PP

¶8

----Respondent

¶9

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijendra Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A.

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order

¶11

09/07/2026

¶12

The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 23.01.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge Ajmer, in Criminal Misc. Case (CIS) No.103/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.94/2025, Police StationPisangan, District-Ajmer for the offences under Sections 309(6), 331(8), 115(2) & 118(7) of BNS, 2023.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 31.05.2025. He further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, offences are triable by Magistrate, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail.

[2026:RJ-JP:25724]

[CRLMB-2811/2026]

(2 of 3)

Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the present bail application and submits that as many as 27 criminal cases involving similar offences are reported to be pending against the petitioner. Therefore, it is prayed that the petitioner may not be enlarged on bail.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record.

¶19

Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last one year; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; trial will take considerable time but considering the fact that as many as 27 criminal cases are reported to be pending against the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted subject to imposition of stringent conditions.

¶20

Consequently, the bail application is allowed . It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely- Debilal Nath S/o Laxman Nath @ Naru arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.94/2025, Police Station-Pisangan, District-Ajmer, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/ (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions:

¶21

(i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court;

(3 of 3)

[2026:RJ-JP:25724]

[CRLMB-2811/2026]

(ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected;

¶26

(iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and

¶27

(iv) In the event the petitioner is found involved in any other case of similar nature in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein.

¶28

(v) The accused-petitioner shall mark his presence before the concerned police station once in a month as fixed by the Investigating Officer and a register shall be maintained for the same by Investigating Officer.

¶29

(vi) In case of any change of residential address, the accused-petitioner shall immediately inform the Investigating Officer as well as the trial Court.

¶30

(BIPIN GUPTA),J

¶31

Sudha/14

Debilal Nath S/O Laxman Nath @ Naru v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Debilal Nath S/O Laxman Nath @ Naru v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umrao Mal S/O Shri Dulha Ram Vs State of Rajasthan

Krishan Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Mukesh Chand Sharma Vs State of Rajasthan

Rakesh Kumar S/O Shri Ashok Kumar Vs the State of Rajasthan

Abdul Khalid S/O Shri Subbi Vs State of Rajasthan

Jahid S/O Khurshid Vs State of Rajasthan

Bhavesh S/O Shri Bhagchand Vs the State of Rajasthan