Allowed

Anish Son of Mubba v. State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan HC22 Jan 2026CRLMB/5/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Six young accused in a fraud case registered at Kaithwada police station sought regular bail. The court found no prior criminal record, custody since December 2025, and trial likely to be prolonged, and granted bail to all six on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted to all six petitioners on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 each with two like sureties, subject to court appearance.

Anish Son of Mubba Vs State of Rajasthan — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2026)

¶1

[2026:RJ-JP:2973]

¶2

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶3

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5/2026

¶4

Anish Son Of Mubba, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Amruka Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).

¶5

Shahid @ Sahil S/o Jursaid, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Amruka Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg).

¶6

----Petitioners

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶9

----Respondent

¶10

Connected With

¶11

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6/2026 Tauheed S/o Harun, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Jhangpuri Police Station Kaithwara District Deeg. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg).

¶12

----Petitioner

¶13

Versus

¶14

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶15

----Respondent

¶16

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 98/2026

¶17

Jilsad S/o Ibri, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gadi Jheel Patti, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (Currently In District Jail, Deeg).

¶18

Rijwan S/o Raheesh, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Gadi Jheel Patti, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (Currently In District Jail, Deeg).

¶19

----Petitioners

¶20

Versus

¶21

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶22

----Respondent

¶23

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 497/2026

¶24

Vasid S/o Sameer Khan, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Rasoolpur, P.s. Kaithwada, District Deeg (Presently Confined In Sub Jail At Deeg, District Deeg).

[2026:RJ-JP:2973]

[CRLMB-5/2026]

----Petitioner

(2 of 3)

Versus

State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp

¶31

----Respondent

¶32

For Petitioner(s)	: Mr. Arafat Hussain
	Mr. Sanjay Khan
	Mr. Ravi Kumar Yadav on behalf of Mr. Harendra Singh
	Mr. Anupam Sharma with Mr. Harshit Parashar
For Respondent(s)	: Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh

¶33

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR

¶34

Order

¶35

22/01/2026

¶36

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls viuh fu;fer tekur gsrq iFkd~&iFkd~ tekur izkFkZuk i= Hkkjrh; ukxfjd lqj{kk lafgrk dh /kkjk 483 ds varxZr iqfyl Fkkuk& dSFkokM+k] ftyk& Mhx esa ntZ izFke lwpuk izfrosnu la[;k& 206@2025 vijk/k varxZr /kkjk 111(2)(a), 111(3), 111(4), 112(2), 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2)(a) Hkkjrh; U;k; lafgrk ,oa /kkjk 66Mh lwpuk izkS|ksfxdh vf/kfu;e esa is”k fd, x, gSaA

¶37

izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo}ku~ vf/koDrk dk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks izdj.k esa >wBk lac) fd;k x;k gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 05-12-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dks tekur dk ykHk fn;k tk,A

¶38

fo}ku~ yksd vfHk;kstd }kjk tekur vkosnu dk fojks/k fd;k x;kA mudk rdZ gS fd izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo#) vkWuykbu ÝkWM dj

[CRLMB-5/2026]

[2026:RJ-JP:2973]

(3 of 3)

yksxksa ls Bxh dj jkf”k izkIr djus dk vkjksi gSA vr% izkFkhZx.k@ vfHk;qDrx.k ds tekur vkosnu vLohdkj fd, tk,aA

¶43

cgl lquh xbZA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA

¶44

izdj.k ds xq.kkoxq.kksa ij bl izØe ij dksbZ fVIi.kh fd;k tkuk visf{kr ugha gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k fnukad 05-12-2025 ls vfHkj{kk esa py jgs gSa ,oa izdj.k ds fopkj.k esa yack le; yxus dh laHkkouk gSA izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k dk iwoZ esa dksbZ vkijkf/kd fjdkWMZ ugha gSA vr% mijksDr rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dks n`f"Vxr j[krs gq, eSa izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k ds tekur vkosnuksa dks Lohdkj fd, tkus ;ksX; le>rk gw¡A

¶45

ifj.kker% izkFkhZx.k@vfHk;qDrx.k 1- vuh”k iq= eqCck] 2- lkfgn mQZ lkfgy iq= tqjlSn] 3- rkSfgn iq= gk:u] 4- ftylkn iq= bcjh] 5- fjtoku iq= jgh”k] 6- okfln iq= lehj [kka dh vksj ls izLrqr tekur izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj fd, tkrs gSa vkSj vkns”k fn;k tkrk gS fd ;fn izR;sd izkFkhZ@vfHk;qDr bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks’kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mls ryc fd;k tkos] mifLFkfr gsrq ipkl gtkj #i;s dk O;fDrxr ca/ki= o iPphl&iPphl gtkj #i;s dh nks lqn`<+ ,oa fo”oluh; izfrHkwfr;ka izLrqr djs rFkk mudh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko”;drk u gks] rks vfoyEc tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tkosA

¶46

(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J

¶47

MOHIT/ 102-105

Anish Son of Mubba v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anish Son of Mubba v. State of Rajasthan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamlesh Bijarniya S/O Jagdish Bijarniya Vs State of Rajasthan

Ganesh S/O Chiranji Vs State of Rajasthan

Baghchand S/O Nathulal Vs the State of Rajasthan

Nasim B W/O Maksud Vs State of Rajasthan

Jilsad S/O Ibri Vs State of Rajasthan

Lekhraj S/O Bajranglal Vs State of Rajasthan